Accreditations
This programme consists of two semesters of lectures and two semesters for the preparation and realization of the student's dissertation or final project.
Programme Structure for 2024/2025
Curricular Courses | Credits | |
---|---|---|
Research Methods in Anthropology
6.0 ECTS
|
Parte Escolar > Mandatory Courses | 6.0 |
Contemporary Migrations
6.0 ECTS
|
Parte Escolar > Mandatory Courses | 6.0 |
Issues in Anthropological Knowledge
6.0 ECTS
|
Parte Escolar > Mandatory Courses | 6.0 |
Anthropological Theory: Explanation and Interpretation
6.0 ECTS
|
Parte Escolar > Mandatory Courses | 6.0 |
Culture and Cognition
6.0 ECTS
|
Parte Escolar > Mandatory Courses | 6.0 |
Human Rights and Culture
6.0 ECTS
|
Parte Escolar > Mandatory Courses | 6.0 |
Designing Research Project in Anthropology
6.0 ECTS
|
Parte Escolar > Mandatory Courses | 6.0 |
Anthropological Theory: Categorization E Classification
6.0 ECTS
|
Parte Escolar > Mandatory Courses | 6.0 |
Internship Or Research Project in Anthropology
6.0 ECTS
|
Parte Escolar > Optional Courses > Conditioned | 6.0 |
Dissertation in Anthropology
48.0 ECTS
|
Final Work | 48.0 |
Work Project in Anthropology
48.0 ECTS
|
Final Work | 48.0 |
Research / Project Design in Anthropology 1
6.0 ECTS
|
Parte Escolar > Optional Courses > Conditioned | 6.0 |
Research / Project Design in Anthropology 2
6.0 ECTS
|
Parte Escolar > Mandatory Courses | 6.0 |
Research Methods in Anthropology
LG1 ? To develop a theoretically informed perspective on the construction of the ethnographic canon and its transformations in the course of the discipline's history.
LG 2 ? To understand the ethnographic practice as a perspective on research and identify its main instruments, strategies and underlying ethical issues.
LG 3 ? To develop critical reading skills of theoretical-methodological texts and monographs.
LG 4 ? To formulate appropriate questions for research in anthropology and elaborate the appropriate methodological choices in view of the master's thesis work.
PC1 - The construction of the ethnographic canon and its multiple declinations.
PC 2 ? The politics and the poetics of ethnography: deconstructions and reconstructions of the canon.
PC 3 - Ethnography as a perspective on research: instruments, strategies and ethics in fieldwork. Readings of theoretical-methodological reflection texts.
PC4 - The ?new terrains? and their methodological challenges. Critical and analytical readings of monographs.
PC 5 - The challenges of ethnographic practice: pertinent questions, scales and dimensions of analysis, design and planning of research in Anthropology.
The following assessment tools will be used:
Critical commentary (1000-1500 words) on theoretical and methodological reflection text - 40%
Essay (up to 3000 words) on a monograph - 60%
Students who do not obtain a grade higher than 10 in the periodic assessment must go to the exam.
Title: Tachi, J. et alli 2003 Ethnographic Action Research, UNESCO. New Delhi.
Sarró, Ramon & Lima Antónia 2003 Terrenos Metropolitanos. Ensaios sobre a produção etnográfica, Imprensa de Ciências Sociais
Robben, Antonius C.G.M. and Jeffrey A. Sluka (Ed.) 2027 Ethnographic fieldwork : an anthropological reader, Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Pink, Sarah at alli, 2016 Digital Etnography. Principles and Practice, Sage Publications
Bryman, Alan (Ed.) 2001 Etnography, Sage Publications
Abu-Lughod, L. 2000 ?Locating Ethnography? Ethnography 1 (2): 261-67.
Authors:
Reference: null
Year:
Title: Watson, C. W. 1999 Being there: six anthropological accounts of fieldwork, Pluto Press
Vokes, Richard 2007 ?(Re)constructing the Field through Sound: Actor-networks, Ethnographic Representation Representation and 'Radio Elicitation' in South-western Uganda? in Tim Ingold e Elisabeth Hallan (Eds) Creativity and Cultural Imprositation, Oxford: Berg, p. 285-303.
Tachi, J. et all. 2003. Ethnographic Action Research. UNESCO. New Delhi.
Spiess, Maiko Rafael e Marcos Antônio Mattedi 2010 ?Da Associação à Dissolução da Rede Sociotécnica do Processador de Textos Fácil: Subsídios Para uma Etnografia da Tecnologia? Mana 16(2): 435-470.
Roger Sanjek (ed.) 1990 Fieldnotes. The Making of Anthropology, Ithaca, London: Cornell University Press
Poirier,J. & Clapier Valladon, S. & Raybaut (1983) 1995 Histórias de Vida - Teoria e Prática, Celta, Oeiras
Peters, John Durham 2001 ?Seeing Bifocality: Media, Place, Culture? in: Akhil e James Ferguson (Eds) 2001Culture, Power, Place. Explorations in Critical Anthropology, Duke University Press.
Postill, John 2006 Media and Nation Building. How the Iban became Malasians, Berghahn Books.
Peirano, Mariza 1995 A favor da etnografia, Rio de Janeiro : Relume-Dumará.
O?Neill, Brian J. & Pais de Brito, Joaquim 1991 Lugares de Aqui, Lisboa, D.Quixote
O' Neill, B. J. 1988 "Reflexões sobre o Estudo de Caso Antropológico" in O estudo da História: Boletim dos Sócios da Associação de Professores de História, nº 5-6 (II série), p. 5-23.
O'Neill, Brian 1984 Proprietários, Lavradores e Jornaleiras. Desigualdade Social numa Aldeia Transmontana, 1870-1978, Lisboa: Dom Quixote.
Miller, Daniel et alli, 2016. How the World Changed Social Media. London: UCL Press.
Miller, Daniel & Heather A. Horst. 2012. ?The Digital and the Human: A Prospectus for Digital Anthropology?. in Heather A. Horst & Daniel Miller. Digital Anthropology. London/New York: Berg Publishers. pp. 3-35.
Miller, Daniel 2011 Tales of Facebook, Cambridge: Polity Press
Lahire, B. (1996), ?La variation des contextes en sciences sociales: remarques épistémologiques?, Annales: Histoire, Sciences Sociales, 2, Março-Abril, pp. 381-407.
Jorba, Juan M. García 2000 Diarios de Campo, CIS: Madrid.
Hine, Christine 2000 Virtual Etnography, Sage Publications
Gupta, Akhil and James Ferguson 1997 Anthropological locations: boundaries and grounds of a field science, University of California Press.
Hume, Lynne and Jane Mulcock (Ed.) 2004 Anthropologists in the field: cases in participant observation, Columbia University Press.
Garsten, Christine 2011 ?Ethnography in the Interface?. 'Corporate Social Responsability' as an Anthropological Field of Inquiry? in Ethographic Practice in The Present, Marit Melhuus et all (Ed.) New York, Oxford: Berghanh Books, pp.56-68
Ginsburg, Faye D.; Lila Abu-Lughood & Brian Larkin, 2002 Media Worlds. Anthropology on New Terrain. Berkeley: University of California Press. pp. 1-36.
Fradique, Teresa 2003 Fixar o movimento representações da música rap em Portugal, Lisboa: Don Quixote.
Fabian, Johanes 1983 Time and the Other. How Anthrpology makes its object, Columbia University Press
Ethnologia (6-8), 1997, Nova Série, ?Trabalho de campo?, dossier org. por Maria Cardeira da Silva
Dawson, C. 2002 Practical Research Methods. A user-friendly guide to mastering research techniques and projects, Oxford: How To Do Books Ltd.
Cliford, James; George Marcus 1986 Writing Culture. The Politics and Poetics of Etnography, University of California Press
Caria, Telmo H. (org.) 2002 Experiência Etnográfica em Ciências Sociais, Porto: Ed. Afrontamento
Armbrust, Walter 2000 ?Introduction. Anxieties of Scale? in: Walter Armbrust (Ed.) 2000 Mass Mediations. New Approaches to Popular Culture in the Middle East and Beyond, University of California Press.
American Anthropological Association Statement on Ethics, available online at the following web site: http://www.aaanet.org/stmts/ethstmnt.htm;
Authors:
Reference: null
Year:
Contemporary Migrations
After attending this UC, students must be able to:
OA1.To understand the importance of migration processes within the various social dimensions (family, economic, political, religious, symbolic, biological, cultural, relational and experiential);
OA2. to understand studies on migration in articulation with contemporary approaches to these complex processes that have abandoned economicist approaches
OA3. To be able to analyze migration processes within general Anthropological Theory.
This curricular unit aims at:
P1 - aproaching the debate on the main anthropological subjects: culture, ethnicity, identity, borders, belonging and difference, highlighting the cultural steryotypes underpinning host countries policies and interactions between social services and migrant users;
P2 - reflecting on the social, economical, and political conditions of
departure countries and on the mobility-generating factors based on given ethnographic examples;
P3 - analysing host contexts and integration processes of immigrants at the local and national levels, considering both institutional and non-governmental and informal actors.
P4 - promoting the study of migration as a result of social forces, family projects and individual motivations, analysing concrete trajectories from an interdisciplinary perspective.
Assessment at UC is carried out throughout the semester, with a minimum attendance of 80% and based on oral participation in seminars (30%) and a written essay on a topic agreed with the professor (70%)
Students who obtain a final grade greater than or equal to 10 points will be approved at the UC.
Students who do not pass will not be able to take the exam.
Title: Baganha, Maria I., José Marques e Pedro Góis (2004), ?Novas Migrações, Novos Desafios: a Imigração do Leste Europeu.? Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais, 69: 95-115
Brettell, Caroline (2003) Anthropology and Migration: Essays on Transnationalism, Ethnicity and Identity. Walnut Creek: Altamira Press,
Inda, Jonathan Xavier (2011), ?Borderzones of Enforcement: Criminalization, Workplace Raids, and Immigrant Counter-Conducts.? In Vicki J. Squire (ed) The Contested Politics of Mobility: Borderzones and Irregularity. London: Routledge: 74-90.
Leal, João (2009) ?Traveling Rituals: Azorean Holy Ghost Festivals In Southeastern N E W England1? Holton, Kimberly DaCosta & Andrea Klimt (Ed) Community, Culture and the Makings of Identity:Portuguese-Americans along the Eastern Seaboard, North Dartmouth, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth: 127-144
Massey D.S. et al.,(1998) Worlds in Motion: Understanding International Migration at the End of the Millennium. Oxford, Oxford University Press
Authors:
Reference: null
Year:
Title: Baganha, Maria I., José Marques e Pedro Góis (2004), ?Novas Migrações, Novos Desafios: a Imigração do Leste Europeu.? Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais, 69: 95-115
Bastos, C, Vale de Almeida e B. Feldman-Bianco (Org.) (2002) Trânsitos coloniais ? diálogos críticos luso-brasileiros. Lisboa, ICS.
Brettell, Caroline (2003) Anthropology and Migration: Essays on Transnationalism, Ethnicity and Identity. Walnut Creek: Altamira Press,
Inda, Jonathan Xavier (2011), ?Borderzones of Enforcement: Criminalization, Workplace Raids, and Immigrant Counter-Conducts.? In Vicki J. Squire (ed) The Contested Politics of Mobility: Borderzones and Irregularity. London: Routledge: 74-90.
Leal, João (2009) ?Traveling Rituals: Azorean Holy Ghost Festivals In Southeastern N E W England1? Holton, Kimberly DaCosta & Andrea Klimt (Ed) Community, Culture and the Makings of Identity:Portuguese-Americans along the Eastern Seaboard, North Dartmouth, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth: 127-144
Massey D.S. et al., (1998) Worlds in Motion: Understanding International Migration at the End of the Millennium. New York and Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Baganha, Maria I. (Ed), (1997) Immigration in Southern Europe. Oeiras, Celta.
Baganha, Maria I. e P. GÓIS (1998/1999), ?Migrações internacionais em Portugal: o que sabemos e para onde vamos?. Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociai. Pp:229-280
Bastos, C, Vale de Almeida e B. Feldman-Bianco (Org.) (2002) Trânsitos coloniais ? diálogos críticos luso-brasileiros. Lisboa, ICS.
Blom Hansen, Thomas and Stepputat Finn (eds), (2005), Sovereign Bodies: Citizens, Migrants, and States in the Postcolonial World, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Challinor, Elizabeth P. (2012), ?(Ir)responsible mothers? Cape Verdeans and Portuguese social care.? International Journal Of Migration, Health And Social Care, VOL. 8, NO. 1: 12-22
Glick Schiller, Nina, Linda Basch, and Cristina Szanton Blanc, (1995)? From Immigrant to Transmigrant: Theorizing Transnational Migration?, Anthropological Quarterly. Vol. 68 (1): 48-63.
Grillo, R., e Gardner, K. (2002), ?Transnational households and ritual: an overview?. Global Networks. Vol. 2 (3): 179-191.
Inda, Jonathan Xavier and Renato Rosaldo (ed) (2002), The Anthropology of Globalization: A Reader. Blackwell Publishers.
Machado, Igor Rennó (2003) Cárcere Publico: processos de exotização entre imigrantes brasileiros no Porto, Portugal, tese de doutorado, UNICAMP, Campinas.
Vacchiano, Francesco ?Os confins no corpo: experiência, subjetividade e incorporação nos itinerários dos jovens migrantes marroquinos na Europa??
Weil, Patrick (2001), ?Access to citizenship: A comparison of twenty five nationality laws?, in Aleinikoff, T. Alexander and Douglas Klusmeyer (ed.), Citizenship Today: Global Perspectives and Practices, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Washington DC: 17-35.
Authors:
Reference: null
Year:
Issues in Anthropological Knowledge
The syllabus contents described correspond term by term, as indicated, with the learning objectives, which derive directly from the syllabus proposal of the course.
OA1 capacity for processing the contents of the course in order to formulate problems and new topics for research
OA2 capacity to link widely the contents of the course with other UCs and seminars
OA3 capacity to proceed on the way of a disciplinar reflexion on the meaning and circumstances of the human condition
P1.1. The human condition in the time of the Anthropocene
P1.2. 'Oikoumene'
P1.3. The improbable primate
P1.4. Anthropology, biology and complexity
P1.5. Phenomenology, perspectivism and ontologies of nature
P1.6. The 'human zoo'
a) Class attendance, as well as participation in talks and comments in Moodle - 20% of final mark
b) Essay (8-10 pages) - 80% of final mark. Before issuing the final mark the teacher may call on students to clarify their work on the essay.
c) For those who missed classes or show insufficient work there will be a final exam (100%).
Title: ABRAM David, A Magia do Sensível. Percepção e linguagem num mundo mais do que humano, 2007, Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian,
BLAFFER HRDY Sarah, Mothers and Others. The Evolutionary Origins of Mutual Understanding, 2009, Cambridge and London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press,
BONNEUIL Christophe and FRESSOZ Jean-Baptiste, The Shock of the Anthropocene. Earth, History and Us, 2016, London and New York: Verso,
FINLAYSON Clive, The Improbable Primate: How Water Shaped Human Evolution, 2014, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press,
FUCHS Thomas, Ecology of the Brain. The Phenomenology and Biology of the Embodied Mind, 2018, Oxford: Oxford University Press,
INGOLD Tim, Being Alive. Essays on Movement, Knowledge and Description, 2011, Routledge, UK and USA,
LEWONTIN Richard C., Biology As Ideology, 1991, Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, Massey Lectures Series.,
Authors:
Reference: null
Year:
Title: BEDNARIK Robert, The Human Condition, 2011, New York: Springer.,
CASTRO Eduardo Viveiros de, 'Os pronomes cosmológicos e o perspectivismo ameríndio', 1996, Mana 2(2) 1996, pp. 115-144,
European Association of Social Anthropologists, EASA policy paper: 'Why Anthropology Matters', October 2015., EASA,
GODELIER Maurice, 'Is Social Anthropology Still Worth the Trouble? A Response to Some Echoes from América', 2000, Ethnos , vol. 65 :3 , 2000: 301?316.,
HORNBORG Alf, 'Animism, Fetishism, and Objectivism as Strategies for Knowing (or not Knowing) the World', 2006, Ethnos, vol. 71:1, 2006, pp. 21-32.,
INGOLD Tim, 'Who studies humanity? The scope of Anthropology', 1985, Anthropology Today, Vol. 1, nº6, Dec 1985, pp. 15-16,
INGOLD Tim, 'Beyond biology and culture. The meaning of evolution in a relational world', 2004, Social Anthropology 12, 2, pp. 209-221.,
INGOLD Tim, 'Prospect', 2013, in Pálsson, Gisli and Ingold, Tim, Biosocial Becomings: Integrating Social and Biological Anthropology, Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-21.,
INGOLD Tim, 'Sobre levar os outros a sério', 2019, in Antropologia, para que Serve. Petrópolis: Vozes,
KNORR-CETINA Karin, 'Post-humanist challenges to the human and social sciences', 2006, in Galiardi, Pasquale and Kzarniawska, Barbara (eds.), Management Education and Humanities, UK and USA: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 233-245,
MCMURTRY John, 'Behind Global System Collapse: The Life-Blind Structure of Economic Rationality', 2012, Journal of Business Ethics, 108:49-60.,
PÁLSSON Gisli et alt, 'Reconceptualizing the Anthropos in the Anthropocene; Integrating the social sciences and humanities in global environmental change research', 2013, Environmental Science & Policy, 28 (2013), pp.3-13.,
SCHEPER-HUGHES Nancy, 'The Last Commodity: Post-Human Ethics and the Global Traffic in Fresh Organs', 2005, In Ong, Aihwa and Colier, Stephen J. (eds.), 2005 Global Assemblages. Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems, USA, UK and Australia: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 145-167,
TOREN Christina, 'Anthropology as the Whole Science of What it is to Be Human', 2002, in Richard Fox and Barbara King, Anthropology Beyond Culture, Berg, Oxford and New York, pp. 105-124.,
WINNER Langdon, 'Resistence is Futile: The Post-Human Condition and its Advocates', 2005, in Baillie, Harold W. and Casey, Timothy K. (eds.), Is Human Nature Obsolete? Genetics, Bioengineering and The Future of the Human Condition, The MIT Press, pp. 385-411,
CRARY, Jonathan, 24/7 Capitalismo Tardio e os Fins do Sono, 2014, São Paulo: Cosac Naify,
CRARY, Jonathan, Scorched Earth, Beyond the Digital Age to a Post-capitalist World, 2022, London, New York: Verso,
DUFOUR, Dany-Robert, The Art of Shrinking Heads. The New Servitude of the Liberated in the Era of Total Capitalism, 2008, Cambridge: Polity Press,
INGOLD, Tim, The Perception of the Environment. Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill, 2000, London and New York: Routledge,
Authors:
Reference: null
Year:
Anthropological Theory: Explanation and Interpretation
At the end of the CU, the student should be able to:
LO1. Have a good knowledge of the main theoretical-anthropological debates and be able to critically articulate specific themes in the more general context of the historical and theoretical development of anthropology and social sciences.
LO2. Critically and analytically explain the theoretical problems addressed throughout the CU, demonstrating good skills of argumentation, synthesis and comparison.
LO. Formulate an articulated an informed discourse on the relationship between anthropology and society, developing the capacity for critical reflection on the potential and relevance of anthropological and social theory in the public space.
PC1. Unity and difference.
Anthropology and social theory. Hegemonic traditions, plural genealogies and World Anthropologies. The elephant in the room: the concept of culture.
PC2. Anthropology as theory of practice and practice of theory
Experience and cognition. Structure, agency and theories of practice. Production and reproduction. Comparison and “family resemblances”.
PC3. Epistemologies of difference
Feminist perspectives and decolonial critique. Other epistemologies and other ontologies.
PC.4. Culture, power, agency
Gramscian meditations. Hegemony and subalternity. Common sense as an anthropological concept.
PC5. Ethics, practice, epistemology
Scientific neutrality and objectivity. Positionality and “situated knowledge”. Collaborative epistemologies. Anthropological theory and public space.
Assessment will take place throughout the semester as follows:
A) Attendance and participation in classes and debates: 20%
B) Individual and collaborative work with presentation of short written texts throughout the CU: 20%
C) Final test: 60%
Optionally, the assessment can be done through a final exam: 100%.
Title: Barnard, Alan (2022), History and Theory in Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Candea, Matei (ed.) (2018), Schools and Styles of Anthropological Theory. London: Routledge.
Herzfeld, Michael (2001), Anthropology: Theoretical Practice in Culture and Society. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Moore, Henrietta, & Todd Sanders (eds) (2014), Anthropology in Theory: Issues in Epistemology. London: Wiley Blackwell.
Lins Ribeiro, Gustavo, & Arturo Escobar (eds) (2006), World Anthropologies: Disciplinary Transformations within Systems of Power. Oxford-New York: Berg.
Lewin, Ellen (ed) (2006), Feminist Anthropology: A Reader. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Authors:
Reference: null
Year:
Title: Allen, Jafari S., & Ryan Cecil Jobson (2016), The Decolonizing Generation: (Race and) Theory in Anthropology since the Eighties. Current Anthropology 57(2): 129-148.
Alves de Matos, Patrícia (2023), Distributed agency: Care, human needs, and distributive struggles in Portugal. Critique of Anthropology 44(1): 82-96.
Bastos, Cristiana, Miguel Vale de Almeida, Bela Feldman-Bianco, eds. 2002. Trânsitos coloniais: Diálogos críticos Luso-Brasileiros. Lisbon: Imprensa de Ciências Sociais.
Candia, Matei (2018), Comparison in Anthropology: The Impossible Method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Crehan, Kate (2004), Gramsci, cultura e antropologia. Lisboa: Campo da Comunicação (ed. orig. 2002).
Crehan, Kate (2011), Gramsci’s concept of common sense: A useful concept for anthropologists? Journal of Modern Italian Studies 16(2): 273–287.
Haraway, Donna (1988), Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies. 14 (3): 575–599.
Kirsch, Stuart (2006), Reverse Anthropology: Indigenous Analysis of Social and Environmental Relations in New Guinea. Stanford University Press 2006.
Lewin, Ellen, & Leni M. Silverstein (eds) (2016), Mapping Feminist Anthropology In The Twenty-First Century. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Narotzky, Susana (2007), The Project in the Model: Reciprocity, Social Capital, and the Politics of Ethnographic Realism. Current Anthropology 48(3): 403-424.
Trnka, Susanna, & Jesse Hession Grayman, L. L. Wynn (eds) (2023), Forum: Decolonizing Anthropology: Global Perspectives. American Ethnologist 50(3).
Wolf, Eric R. (2001), Pathways of Power: Building an Anthropology of the Modern World. Berkeley: University of California Press.
De la Cadena, Marisol, & Mario Blaser (eds) (2018), A World of Many Worlds. Durham & London: Dule University Press.
Authors:
Reference: null
Year:
Culture and Cognition
LO1. Know the main connections between language, culture and human cognition
LO2. Understand some contemporary issues about cognition
LO3. Know the main advantages and limitations of the models and methods studied
P1. Anthropology and cognitive science.
P2. The issue of common sense in anthropology.
P3. The problems of pre-conscious cognition.
P4. Cognition and culture
P5. The study of implicit thought: case studies.
P6. Conceptual metaphors.
Assessment throughout the semester: Leadership in one seminar discussion (30%), informed participation in discussions (10%), final essay (60%);.
OR
Final exam (100%).
Title: Bloch, Maurice. How We Think They Think: Anthropological Approaches To Cognition, Memory, and Literacy. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1998.
Lakoff, George. «The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor.» In Metaphor and Thought. Edited by Andrew Ortony. 2nd ed. Cambidge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
Lee-Whorf, Benjamin. «Science and Linguistics.» Technological Review 42, no. 6 (1940): 229–31, 247. https://web.mit.edu/allanmc/www/whorf.scienceandlinguistics.pdf
Malinowski, Bronislaw. The Sexual Life of Savages in North-Western Melanesia. 3rd ed. London: Routledge, 1932. Cap. 7.
Mercier, Hugo and Dan Sperber. «Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory.» Behavioral and Brain Science 34, no. 2 (2011): 57–111.
Ross, Norbert e Douglas L. Medin. «Culture and Cognition.» In A Companion to Cognitive Anthropology. Edited by David B. Kronenfeld, Giovanni Bennardo, Victor C. de Munck e Michael D. Fischer. 357–75. John Wiley & Sons, 2015.
Authors:
Reference: null
Year:
Title: Barkow, Jerome H., Leda Cosmides and John Tooby, eds. The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture. First Edition. Reprint, Oxford University Press, 1992-08-06.
Gentner, Dedre and Susan Goldin-Meadow, eds. Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought. MIT Press, 2003-03-14.
Bloch, Maurice. Anthropology and the Cognitive Challenge. Cambridge University Press, 2012-06-28.
Goldin-Meadow, Susan. Thinking with Your Hands: The Surprising Science Behind How Gestures Shape Our Thoughts. Hachette UK, 2023-06-13. http://books.google.pt/books?id=HYWSEAAAQBAJ&hl=&source=gbs_api
Authors:
Reference: null
Year:
Human Rights and Culture
Upon conclusion of the course, students should be capable of:
OA1. Identifying the main historical developments in the Human Rights' agenda;
OA2. Identifying the main changes in anthropology's receptiveness of the Human Rights' agenda
OA3. Explaining, comparing and criticizing trhe different theoretical approaches to the relationship between universal human rights and cultural relativity
CP1. Introduction to the course: The Universal Declaration of Human Rights
CP2. Anthropology and Human Rights
CP3. The universalism vs relativism debate
CP4. The concept of culture as a key issue in the debate
CP5. Two critical examples: the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights and the U.N. Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples
CP6. Recent Perspectives in Anthropology
CP7. International promotion of Women's Rights
CP8. Sexual orientation and gender identity: The Yogjakarta Principles
CP9. Critical perspectives: Human rights and the logic of neoliberalism.
CP10. The question of intercultural dialogue and cultural translation
Evaluation system: ongoing or exam. On-going: with 2 evaluation instruments - discussion of the readings in class (40%) and a final essay, 7 pp max (60%). It assumes, for the 1st instrument, a rate of attendance of at least 80%, oral participation in class, as well as its quality. The 2nd instrument will evaluate writing skills, the quality of bibliographical research, acquired knowledge, and skills of analysis and synthesis. Evaluation by exam: in the first turn, second turn or in the special turn.
BibliographyTitle: United Nations, 2006, The Yogkakarta Principles
Sousa Santos, B., s.d., Por uma concepção multicultural dos direitos humanos, online no site www.dhnet.org.br
Zizek, S., 2005, Against Human Rights, New Left Review, 34: 115-131.
Cowan, J., 2006, Culture and rights after Culture and Rights, Am. Anth., 108(1): 9-24
Eriksen, Th., 2001, Between universalism and relativism: a critique of the UNESCO concepts of culture, in J. Cowan, M.-B. Dembour e R. Wilson, orgs., Culture and Rights: Anthropological Perspectives, pp 127-48, CUP.
Turner, T., 1997, Human rights, human difference: Anthropology's contribution to an emancipatory cultural politics, Jrnl Anthro. Research, 53: 273-279.
Hatch, E., 1997, The good side of relativism, Jrnl Anthrop. Research, 53: 371-381
Zechenter, E., 1997, In the name of culture: cultural relativism and the abuse of the individual, Jrnl Anthro. Research, 53: 319-347
Messer, E., 1993, Anthropology and human rights, Annual Review of Anthropology, 22: 221-249
Authors:
Reference: null
Year:
Title: -
Authors:
Reference: null
Year:
Designing Research Project in Anthropology
LG1 Designing a Master's project.
PC1 Research themes and proposals.
PC2 Main steps for the construction of a research project.
PC3 Presentation and discussion of the final project.
Assessment in class 40%, evaluation of the final Project 60%.
BibliographyTitle: Pole, Chris and Sam Hillyard, 2016, Doing Fieldwork, LA, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington CD, Sage Publications.
Eco, Umberto, 2003, Como se faz uma tese em ciências humanas. Lisboa: Presença.
Campbell, Elizabeth and Luke Eric Lassiter, 2015, Doing Ethnography Today. Theories, Methods, Exercises, Oxford, UK and Malden MA, USA, Wiley Blackwell.
Blommaert, Jan and Dong Jie, 2010, Ethnographic Fieldwork. A Beginner's Guide, Bristol, Buffalo and Toronto, Multilingual Matters.
Blaxter, Loraine, Christina Hughes and Malcolm Tight, 2006, How to Research, England and USA, Open University Press.
Authors:
Reference: null
Year:
Title: To be supplied according to each project.
Fornecida consoante o projeto.
Authors:
Reference: null
Year:
Anthropological Theory: Categorization E Classification
Cultivate longitudinal knowledge of the history of the discipline through its theoretical proposals. OA1
Provide theoretical tools and develop critical thinking. OA2
Provide OA3 analytical capability
Provide theoretical and critical background for the exercise of informed citizenship. OA4
Raise students' awareness of contemporary theoretical debates. OA5
P1 - Theoretical debates in anthropology (from 1960 to 2020).
P2 - Anthropology and French thought (Foucault, Bourdieu)
P3 - Feminist deconstruction
P4 - Anthropology and archive
P5 - Anthropology, ethnography and theory
P6 - Comparison in anthropology
P7 - Decentralization. Postcolonial and decolonial thought
P8 - Anthropology today between generalizations and particularism
The assessment process involves two modalities: a) Assessment throughout the semester consisting of the following elements: 1) Participation in classroom discussions and prior reading of texts (20%), and 2) Final work (80%). Or b) assessment by exam. There is no oral exam. The final exam focuses on the basic bibliography and the main topics covered and discussed in classes.
The final work will consist of an essay responding to the following challenge: choose a field, proposal or theoretical tradition, and reflect on its consequences in terms of categorization and classification of the social. The essay must not exceed 7 pages (TNR font or equivalent, size 12, 1.5 spaces between lines, bibliography included) and must include at least 4 references from the mandatory and/or complementary bibliography. Other bibliographic references are optional.
Title: Goody, Jack. 1977, What's in a list?', in The Domestication of the savage mind, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1977.
Hacking, Ian, Kinds of People: Moving Targets?, Proceedings of the British Academy, 2007, 151, 285-318.
Ingold, T., 2008, “Anthropology is not ethnography”, Proceedings of the British Academy,154: 69-92.
Ortner, S. 1984. “Theory in Anthropology since the Sixties”, Comparative Studies in Society and History 26(1): 126-166.
Ortner, S. 2016. “Dark Anthropology and Its Others: Theory since the Eighties”, HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 6(1): 47–73.
Van Der Veer, Peter. The Value of Comparison?, HAU, 2014, 2-13.
Authors:
Reference: null
Year:
Title: Bod, R. and Kursell, J., "The Humanities and the sciences", Isis, 2015, 106, 337-340.
Book Symposium on The Value of Comparison, HAU, 2017, vol.7, nº1, 509-536.
Boyer, Dominic, 2011. Energopolitics and the Anthropology of energy', Anthropology news, 5-7.
Bowker, G and S. Leigh Starr, Sorting Things Out. Classification and its Consequences. Cambridge, Massachusetts-London: The MIT Press, 1999.
Bowker, Geoffrey. C., 2000, Biodiversity Datadiversity, Social Studies of Science, 30, 643-683.
Candea, M., 2016 “On two modalities of comparison in social anthropology”, L’Homme, 218(2)
Col, G da and Graeber D., 2011, “Foreword. The Return of Ethnographic Theory”, HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 1(1): vi-xxxv.
Foucault, M. Governmentality in Buchell, Gordon and Miller eds., The Foucault effect: studies in governmentality, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 1991, 87-104.
Hacking, I., 'Biopower and the avalanche of printed numbers', Humanities and Society, 1982, 272-295.
Hacking, I., The Looping Effect of Human Kinds?, Causal Cognition. A Multidisciplinary Approach, edited by D. Sperber, D. Premack and. A. J. Premack. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996, pp. 351-383.
Marcus, G, The once and future ethnographic archive, History of the Human Sciences 1998 11- 49.
Mbembe, A. Necropolitics, Public Culture, 2003, 15(1), 11-40.
Roque, R. and Wagner K, Introduction in Roque and Wagner eds., Engaging Colonial Knowledge. Reading European archives in World History, Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.
Sanjek, R. (1990). A vocabulary for fieldnotes. Fieldnotes: The makings of anthropology, 92-121.
Snow, C. P. As duas culturas, Lisboa, Presença, 1996.
Stoler, A.L., Along the archival grain, Princeton University Press, 2009.
The Total Archive, Limn, February 2016 ( online)
Van Der Veer, P. The Value of Comparison, Durham and London: Duke University Press, 2016.
Vidal, F and N. Dias, The Endangerment sensibility, in Endangerment, Biodiversity and Culture, Routledge, 2016.
Authors:
Reference: null
Year:
Internship Or Research Project in Anthropology
Upon conclusion of the Internship and its report, students will have:
OA1 - acquired the capacity to plan an original anthropological research in a practical and applied setting
OA2 - concluded the above mentioned research
OA3 - achieved original scientific knowledge sustained by theoretical, methodological and comparative anthropological knowledge in the context of the Internship.
Since an Internsgip is the result of the individual work of the supervisor with the student, in collaboration with the institution that hosts the Internship, a syllabus does not apply.
The Internship Report is evaluated by the supervisor.
BibliographyTitle: Não se aplica
Authors:
Reference: null
Year:
Title: Does not apply
Authors:
Reference: null
Year:
Dissertation in Anthropology
Upon conclusion of the Dissertation, students will have:
OA1 - acquired the capacity to plan an original anthropological research
OA2 - concluded the above mentioned research
OA3 - achieved original scientific knowledge sustained by theoretical, methodological and comparative anthropological knowledge.
Since a Dissertation is the result of the individual work of the supervisor with the student, a syllabus does not apply.
The Dissertation defense lasts one hour and the committee is composed of a President, the Supervisor, and an Examiner.
BibliographyTitle: Não se aplica
Authors:
Reference: null
Year:
Title: Does not apply
Authors:
Reference: null
Year:
Work Project in Anthropology
The student who successfully completes this course should be able to:
OA1: Carry out and operationalize the results of a bibliographic research using all the resources available for this purpose;
OA2: Identify and formulate a problem relevant to the project work;
OA3: Prepare a literature review relevant to the problem formulated;
OA4: Generate empirical arguments dominating the methodologies and instruments of investigation/intervention appropriate to the problem under analysis;
OA5: To communicate in writing and orally the work done and the argumentation elaborated.
The nature of the UC does not allow the definition of a programme with concrete subjects, as it seeks to apply competences already acquired to carry out project work. However, some of the subjects in the UC, adapted and variable according to the specificities of each project, comprise:
CP1: Formulation of the problem and respective theoretical framework (Introduction and Diagnosis of needs)
CP2: Definition of the intervention programme
CP3: Method of implementation and evaluation of the program;
CP4: Writing and presentation standards (Preparation for defense)
The master's project work must be defended in public exams where the technical components, the form of the written work and the public presentation and defense will be evaluated, respecting the norms established by ISCTE-IUL. The Project must be submitted in accordance with the formal requirements and deadlines established by ISCTE-IUL
BibliographyTitle: Não se aplica
Authors:
Reference: null
Year:
Title: Não se aplica
Authors:
Reference: null
Year:
Research / Project Design in Anthropology 1
To provide the methodological development of the research leading to the master thesis.
To develop skils for team research work and scientific debate.
This curricular unit is a space for presentation and discussion of ongoing research and focuses on general aspects of research in anthropology, namely:
Definition and delimitation of the object of study
Ethnographic methods and techniques of data collection
Documentary analysis
Literature search
Formal aspects of organization of the dissertation
Students will be evaluated from the following:
Progress report and participation in discussion- 60%
Final project - 40%
There is no final exam in this course
Title: Not applicable because it is a follow-up seminar of dissertation. The seminar coordinator, in articulation with the thesis supervisor, may suggest relevant readings regarding students' research topics and methodologies.
Não se aplica por se tratar de um seminário de acompanhamento da realização da dissertação. O docente coordenador do Seminário poderá sugerir, em articulação com o orientador de tese, leituras pertinentes em função dos objectos e temáticas de pesquisa dos estudantes.
Authors:
Reference: null
Year:
Title: Não se aplicar
Authors:
Reference: null
Year:
Research / Project Design in Anthropology 2
Students are expected to develop and refine skills in the field of research in anthropology, communication of research results and writing of scientific texts. At the end of this course students shall be able to:
LG1. Present in a consistent way their research results
LG2. Respond to questions and comments about their work
LG3. Participate (with questions, comments, suggestions) in discussion of ongoing research projects.
LG4. Complete the master dissertation (working with the supervisor)
LG5. Prepare and submit, under supervision, communication proposals to scientific events
LG6. Prepare and submit, under supervision, papers proposals to scientific journals
LG7. Participate in research tasks within the framework of projects
Session 1 - Introduction to the objectives of the seminar, teaching-learning process and evaluation system. Organization and timing of presentations.
Sessions 2 to 11 - Presentation of results of ongoing researches.
Session 12 - Evaluation by professor
Students will be evaluated throughout the semester according to the following elements:
Index of Dissertation + Progress Report or chapter of the thesis-60%
Presentation of results - 25%
Participation in discussions - 15%
This course does not include a final exam
Title: Não se aplica por se tratar de um seminário de acompanhamento da realização da dissertação. O docente coordenador do Seminário poderá sugerir, em articulação com o orientador de tese, leituras pertinentes em função dos objectos e temáticas de pesquisa dos/as estudantes.
Not applicable as this is a seminar for monitoring and evaluating the dissertation. The coordinator of the seminar may suggest, in conjunction with the thesis supervisor, relevant readings depending on the the object and subject of the ongoing research.
Authors:
Reference: null
Year:
Title: Não se aplica
Authors:
Reference: null
Year:
Recommended optative
- 03146 | Gender, Justice and Discrimination
- 04131 | Cooperation for Global Development
- 04659 | Civic-Led Global Development
- 04658 | The (Re) Emergence of Asia-Pacific: Ideas, Institutions and Agents
- 03146 | Gender, Justice and Discrimination
- 02077 | Europe-Africa Relations
- 04575 | Contemporary Africa: History and leading actors
- 00774 | Inventory and Analysis of the Urban Heritage
- 00846 | Heritage Cultural Projects
- 03194 | Linguistic Diversity in Contemporary Societies
- 00424 | Contemporary International Migrations
- 01627 | Globalization, Social Justice and Human Rights
Optional courses will only be held if they achieve a minimum number of enrollments.
Objectives
As a general objective, the MSc in Anthropology aims to develop and deepen the skills required for research and projects of an applied nature in the areas of Social and Cultural Anthropology. To that end, it provides students with an up-to-date education in the theoretical and methodological tradition of Anthropology. The programme focuses furthermore on the contemporary expressions of social and cultural phenomena upon which the discipline has historically focused its critical analysis and intervention.
Students will acquire the skills to:
- Produce a work of empirical and/or theoretical investigation in the domain of Anthropology in the form of an academic dissertation.
- Produce projects that prepare students for doctoral research or prioritize practical and applied purposes, which may be developed in internships in organizations or institutions, including Research Centres, NGOs, Museums, Local Authorities, and others.
Thesis / Final work
The Master's requires the completion of an academic dissertation of 42 credits.
The preparation of this dissertation will be guided by a professor or specialist of recognized merit, and will be evaluated and discussed publically before a jury named for this purpose.
Accreditations