Tuition fee EU nationals (2025/2026)
Programme Structure for 2025/2026
| Curricular Courses | Credits | |
|---|---|---|
| 1st Year | ||
|
Applied Political Economy
10.0 ECTS
|
Parte Escolar > Mandatory Courses | 10.0 |
|
Comparative Political Economy
10.0 ECTS
|
Parte Escolar > Mandatory Courses | 10.0 |
|
Philosophy and Methodology of Political Economy
10.0 ECTS
|
Parte Escolar > Mandatory Courses | 10.0 |
|
Economy, Society, Governance
10.0 ECTS
|
Parte Escolar > Mandatory Courses | 10.0 |
|
History of Political Economy
10.0 ECTS
|
Parte Escolar > Mandatory Courses | 10.0 |
|
Seminar on Social Science Research Techniques
10.0 ECTS
|
Parte Escolar > Mandatory Courses | 10.0 |
| 2nd Year | ||
|
Transdisciplinary Research Seminar
10.0 ECTS
|
Parte Escolar > Mandatory Courses | 10.0 |
|
Research Design and Academic Writing
14.0 ECTS
|
Parte Escolar > Mandatory Courses | 14.0 |
|
Research Seminar and Tutorial
5.0 ECTS
|
Parte Escolar > Mandatory Courses | 5.0 |
|
Industrial, Innovation and Research Policy
6.0 ECTS
|
Parte Escolar > Optional Courses | 6.0 |
|
Thesis in Political Economy, Interdisciplinary Phd
133.0 ECTS
|
Phd Thesis in Political Economy, Interdisciplinary Ph.D. (133 Ects) | 133.0 |
| 3rd Year | ||
|
Research Seminar
12.0 ECTS
|
Parte Escolar > Mandatory Courses | 12.0 |
Applied Political Economy
1.Enable students for the theoretical mapping of conceptions about the role of the State in the post-war economy.
2.Enable students to identify and characterize the main historical processes that shaped the contemporary Political Economy.
3.Provide instruments for the analysis of the sectoral specificities, national and regional varieties of the various systems of provision.
4.To enable students to analyse systems of provision on the basis of a methodology that integrates multiple institutional dimensions and their articulations.
5.To enable students to critically analyse the trajectory of systems of provision in Portugal, articulating the international sphere where they integrate with their historical and contextual specificities.????
1. The State and the Economy in the post-war period
-The building-up of various welfare regimes: from Bismarck to Beveridge.
-The Great Depression and the debate on public policies: macroeconomic management and industrial policy.
-The resurgence of liberalism in the post-war period: Thatcher and Reagan.
-Financial and economic integration: from "Bretton Woods" to the Great Recession.
2. Reconfiguration of Systems of Provision
-The new monetary regime (from the reliance on central banks to the deregulation of banks).
-Reconfiguration of public investment regimes (the Public-Private Partnership models).
-Transformations of employment policies and ways of organizing labour markets.
-Tax system and redistribution.
-Corporatization and privatization of public services.
3 Analysis of case studies
-Social Security: pensions systems and social policy.
-Health: the diffused borders between the public and the private.
-Public utilities: Water, electricity, telecommunications, transport.
The evaluation will have three components:
A) participation in the classroom, demonstration of knowledge of the bibliography (25%)
B) presentation of a topic or a case study in class (25%),
C) paper on the subject of the course (50%).
Title: 5. Orenstein, M.A. (Ed.) (2008). Pensions, Social Security, and the Privatization of Risk. Columbia University Press / SSRC Books.
4. Rodrigues, J.; Santos, A.C. & Teles, N. (2016). A Financeirização do Capitalismo em Portugal. Actual Editora.
3. Mirowski, P. (2013). Never let a serious crisis go to waste: How neoliberalism survived the financial meltdown. Verso Books.
2. Maurin, É. (2009). La peur du déclassement: une sociologie des récessions. Paris: Seuil.
1. Kuhnle, S.; Sander, A. (2010). The Emergence of the Western Welfare State. In Castles, F. G.; Leibfried, S.; Lewis, J.; Obinger, H.; Pierson, C. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford Unversity Press.
Authors:
Reference: null
Year:
Title: 21. Wolf, M. (2015). As Mudanças e os Choques. Clube do Autor: Lisboa.
20. van der Wel, K. A., & Halvorsen, K. (2015). ?The bigger the worse? A comparative study of the welfare state and employment commitment?. Work, employment and society, 29(1), 99-118.
19. Streeck, W. (2013). Tempo Comprado: A crise adiada do capitalismo democrático. Actual Editora: Lisboa.
18. Rodrigues, M.J. (1988). O sistema de emprego em Portugal: crise e mutações. Lisboa. Dom Quixote.
17. Orenstein, M.A. (2011). ?Pension privatization in crisis: Death or rebirth of a global policy trend?. International Social Security Review 64, 3, pp. 65-80.
16. Orenstein, M.A. (2013). ?Pension Privatization: Evolution of a Paradigm?. Governance 26, 2, pp. 259?281.
15. Maurin, É. (2009). La peur du déclassement: une sociologie des récessions. Paris: Seuil.
14. Mamede, R.P.; Lagoa, S.; Leão, L.; Barradas, R. (2016). ?The Long Boom and the Early Bust: The Portuguese Economy in the Era of Financialisation?. In E. Hein, D. Detzer and N. Dodig (eds.), Financialisation and the Financial and Economic Crises. Country Studies. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
13. Lapavitsas, Costas (2013). Profitting without Producing: How Finance Exploits Us. Verso Books.
12. Hacker, J.S. (2004). ?Privatizing Risk without Privatizing the Welfare State: The Hidden Politics of Social Policy Retrenchment in the United States?. American Political Science Review 98, 2, pp. 243-260.
11. Hacker, J.S. (2008). The Great Risk Shift: The New Economic Insecurity and the Decline of the American Dream. Oxford University Press.
10. Goodin, R. E.; Headey, B.; Muffels, R. & Dirven, H.-J. (1999). The Real Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge University Press.
9. Gallie, D., & Paugam, S. (Eds.). (2000). Welfare regimes and the experience of unemployment in Europe. OUP Oxford.
8. Galbraith, J. K., & Galbraith, J. K. (2009). The great crash 1929. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
7. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). ?The Three Political Economies of the Welfare State?. In The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
6. Eichengreen, B. (2008). The European Economy since 1945: Coordinated Capitalism and Beyond. Princeton University Press: New Jersey.
5. Blyth, M. (2013). Austerity: The history of a dangerous idea. Oxford University Press.
4. Béland, D. & Orenstein, M. A. (2013). ?International Organizations as Policy Actors: An Ideational Approach?. Global Social Policy 13, 2, pp. 125-143.
3. Bayliss, K.; Fine, B. & Robertson, M. (2013). ?From Financialisation to Consumption: the System of Provision Approach Applied to Housing and Water?. FESSUD Working Paper Series, No 2.
2. Baldwin, P. (1990). The Politics of Social Solidarity. Cambridge University Press.
1. Appelbaum, E. (2011). ?Macroeconomic policy, labour market institutions and employment outcomes?. Work, employment and society, 25(4), 596-610.
Authors:
Reference: null
Year:
Comparative Political Economy
1. Understand the importance of institutions and of its variety in the dynamics of capitalism.
2. Apprehend the multiple scales, national and supranational, that structure the different capitalisms and the way they contribute to processes of homogenization and of variegation as time goes by.
3. Understand the roles that globalization and Europeanization have had in the processes of institutional change at the national level.
4. Learn to use the analytical tools made available to analyze the interaction between international crises and multiscale policy reactions.
1. The Varieties of Capitalism approach.
1.1. Presentation and discussion of its virtues and limits;
1.2. The European models of capitalism.
2. The political economy of globalization and of Europeanization.
2.1.The role of European States and of supranational institutions in economic and financial integration;
2.2.The determinants of institutional homogenization and variegation in the different capitalisms across the continent.
2.3. Asymmetric Europeanization and the articulation between money, finance, public and private, and the Welfare States;
3. The Great Recession and the Eurozone Crisis.
3.1. Analysis of the European imbalances in the context of crisis;
3.2.Analysis of the policy reactions and of the institutional changes in the context of crisis.
The participation in the seminars and the writing of an individual paper are the two components of the assessment, with a respective weight of 35% and 65%.
BibliographyTitle: 7. Streeck, W. (2013), Tempo Comprado ? A Crise Adiada do Capitalismo Democrático, Lisboa: Actual.
6. Rodrik, D. (2011), The Globalization Paradox, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Ryner, M. e Cafruny, A. (2016), The European Union and Global Capitalism ? Origins, Development, Crisis, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
4. Hancké, B. (ed.) (2009), Debating Varieties of Capitalism: A Reader, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Hall, P. (2012), ?The Economics and Politics of the Euro Crisis?, German Politics, 21(4): 355-371.
2. Hay, C. (2011), ?Globalization Impact on States? in J. Ravenhill (ed.), Global Political Economy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 312-344.
1. Clift, B. (2014) Comparative Political Economy, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Authors:
Reference: null
Year:
Title: 28. van Apeldoorn, B. (2002). Transnational Capitalism and the Struggle over European In-tegration. Londres: Routledge.
27. Streeck, W. (2016), How Will Capitalism End ?, Londres: Verso.
26. Spolaore, E. (2013), ?What is European Integration Really About? A Political Guide for Economists?, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(3): 125-144.
25. Soederberg, S., Menz, G. e Cerny, P. (eds.) (2006), Internalizing Globalization: The Rise of Neoliberalism and the Decline of National Varieties of Capitalism, Hampshire: Pal-grave Macmillan.
24. Sapir, J. (2012), La démondialisation, Paris : Seuil.
23. Rodrigues, J., Santos, A. C. e Teles, N. (2016), ?Semi-Peripheral Financialisation?, Re-view of International Political Economy, 23(3): 480-510.
22. Rodrigues, J. e Reis, J. (2012), The Asymmetries of European Integration and the Crisis of Capitalism in Portugal. Competition and Change, 16, 188-205.
21. Reis, J., Rodrigues, J. Santos, A. C. e Teles, N. (2014), ?Compreender a Crise: a econo-mia portuguesa num quadro europeu desfavorável?, in J. Reis (ed.), A Economia Política do Retrocesso, Coimbra: Almedina, pp. 21-86.
20. Polanyi, K. (1944), A Grande Transformação, Lisboa: Edições 70, 2012.
19. Peck, J e Theodre, N. (2007), ?Variegated Capitalism?, Progress in Human Geography, 31(6): 731-772.
18. Molina, O. and Rhodes, M. (2007), ?The Political Economy of Adjustment in Mixed Market Economies: A Study of Spain and Italy?, In Hancke?, B., Rhodes, M., and Thatcher, M. (eds.), Beyond Varieties of Capitalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 223-252.
17. Marques, P. and Salavisa, I. (2016), ?Young People and Dualization in Europe: A Fuzzy Set Analysis?, Socio-Economic Review, 0(0): 1-26. Advance Access.
16. Lapavitsas, C., Kaltenbrunner, A., Lindo, D., Michell, J., Painceira, J.P., Pires, E., Powell, J., Stenfors, A., Teles, N. e Vatikiotis, L. (2011), Crisis in the Eurozone, Londres: Verso.
15. Ingham, G. (2009), Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity Press.
14. Ingham, G. (2004), The Nature of Money: New Directions in Political Economy, Cambridge: Polity Press.
13. Höpner, M. e Schäfer, A. (2012), ?Embeddedness and Regional Integration: Waiting for Polanyi in a Hayekian Setting?, International Organization, 66: 429-455.
12. Holman, O. (2004), ?Asymmetrical Regulation and Multidimensional Governance in the European Union?, Review of International Political Economy, 11: 714-735.
11. Hall, P. e Soskice, D. (eds.) (2001), Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. Frieden, J. (2006), Global Capitalism. Its Fall and Rise in the Twentieth Century, Nova Iorque: Norton.
9. De Grauwe, P. (2013), ?The Political Economy of the Euro?, Annual Review of Political Science, 9: 1-18.
8. Chang, H. J. (2002), Kicking Away the Ladder?Development Strategy in Historical Per-spective, Londres: Anthem Press.
7. Caporaso, J. e Tarrow, S. (2009), ?Polanyi in Brussels: Supranational Institutions and the Transnational Embedding of Markets?, International Organization, 63(4): 593-620.
6. Boyer, R. (2005), ?How and Why Capitalisms Differ?, Economy and Society, 34(4): 509-557.
5. Varieties in Capitalism?, New Political Economy, 16(4): 481-500.
4. Bruff, I. (2011), ?What about the Elephant in the Room? Varieties of Capitalism,
3. Bairoch, P. (2011), Mitos e Paradoxos da História Económica, Lisboa: Terramar.
2. Arrighi, G. (2009), The Long Twentieth Century: Money, Power and the Origins of Our Times, Londres: Verso.
1. Amable, B. (2009) ?Structural Reforms in Europe and the (in)coherence of institutions?, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 25(1): 17-39
Authors:
Reference: null
Year:
Philosophy and Methodology of Political Economy
1.To recognize the relevance of methodological reflection for the construction of knowledge in Political Economy.
2.To show awareness that fundamental debates in the field of Political Economy, such as those concerning the importance and role of values, the relevance of history or about the potentialities and limits of mathematical modeling, ultimately reflect methodological options present in any investigation in Political Economy.
3.Understand the importance and substance of the contributions of the theory of science to the process of knowledge construction in Political Economy.
4.Being able to analyze the place and nature of Political Economy in the more general context of the social sciences.
5.Be able to discuss, in a grounded manner, the relations between the economy, science and politics.
6.Understand the relevance of the discussion on the construction of statistical categories and nomenclatures and economic and social indicators.?
1. Between the philosophy / theory of science and practice: the relevance of methodological awareness.
2. Methodological controversies in Political Economy.
a. Science and values
b. Theory versus History
c. Mathematics, formalism and modeling
3. Contributions of philosophy/theory of science
a. The philosophy and history of science
b. Sociology of science / scientific knowledge and social constructivism
c. Individualism and holism
d. Ontology and critical realism
e. Argumentation, rhetoric and discourse
4. Political Economy and inter / transdisciplinarity
a. Autonomy and interdisciplinary relationships
b. The projects of a unified social science
5. Economy, science and politics
a. Science and Power
b. Economics as a social engineering
c. Objectivity, technical expertise and the means/ends dichotomy
6. Nomenclatures and building of categories in the social sciences.
Class participation (25%)
And
An essay in which students develop a subject of their interest, articulating various topics of the program (75%).
Title: 10.For each topic a reading list and the correspondent texts will be provided
9.?Historical Perspectives on Inequality.? / C. Tilly / In: The Blackwell Companion to Social Inequalities, M. Romero and E. Margolis (eds.), 15?30 /Blackwell,2005
8.A Construção Social da Realidade / P. Berger e T. Luckmann /Dinalivro, 2004 [1966]
7.Exchange, Action, and Social Structure: Elements of Economic Sociology / M. Zafirovski / Praeger, 2005
6.Essays in Trespassing: Economics to politics and beyond /A. Hirschman / Cambridge University Press, 1981
5.Economia e Interdisciplinaridade(s) / C. Kerstenetzky, V. Neves /Almedina, 2012
4.Reorienting Economics / T. Lawson /Routledge, 2003
3.Value-Free Science? Ideals And Illusions / H. Kincaid, J. Dupre?, A. Wylie (eds.) / Oxford University Press, 2007
2.Reassembling the Social ? An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory / B. Latour /Oxford University Press, 2005
1.Reflection without rules: economic methodology and contemporary science theory /D. W. Hands, 2001
Authors:
Reference: null
Year:
Title: 30. Portugal uma Sociedade de Classes: Polarização Social e Vulnerabilidade / Renato Miguel do Carmo (Org.) / Edições 70 / Le Monde Diplomatique Ed. Portuguesa, 2013.
29. ?The Centrality of the Classics? / Jeffrey C. Alexander / In: Stephen Turner (ed.), Social Theory and So-ciology ? The Classics and Beyond / Oxford, Blackwell, 1987 / 1996, pp. 20-38
28. La Science économique à la recherche de ses fondements: La tradition épistémologique ricardienne (1826-1891) / Michel Zouboulakis / Presses universitaires de France, 2015
27. The Varieties of Economic Rationality: From Adam Smith to Contemporary Behavioural and Evolution-ary Economics / Michel Zouboulakis / Routledge, 2014
26. Microfísica do Poder / Michel Foucault / Paz e Terra, 2014
25. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States / Albert Hirschman / Harvard University Press, 1970
24. As Paixões e os Interesses: Argumentos Políticos Para o Capitalismo Antes do seu Triunfo / Albert Hirschman / Bizâncio, 1997
23. More Heat than Light: Economics as Social Physics, Physics as Nature's Economics / Philip Mirowski / Cambridge University Press, reprint edition, 1991
22. Open Economics: Economics in relation to other disciplines / Richard Arena, Sheila Dow and Matthias Klaes (eds.) / Routledge, 2009
21. Interdisciplinaridade: Ambições e Limites / Olga Pombo / Relógio d'Água, 2004
20. Special Sciences and the Unity of Science / Olga Pombo, Shahid Rahman, John Symons and Juan Ma-nuel Torres (Eds.) / Springer, 2012
19. La Economía como Ciencia Moral / Ricardo F. Crespo / Educa, 1997
18. How Economics Forgot History: The Problem of Historical Specificity in Social Science / Geoffrey Hodgson / Routledge, 2001
17. Speaking of Economics: How to get in the conversation / Arjo Klamer / Routledge, 2007
16. Sobre Ética e Economia / Amartya Sen / Almedina, 2012
15. Philosophy of the Economy: An Aristotelian Approach / Ricardo F. Crespo / Springer, 2013
14. The handbook of economic methodology / edited by John B. Davis, D. Wade Hands, Uskali Maki / 1998
13. The Elgar companion to recent economic methodology / edited by John B. Davis, D. Wade Hands / 2011
12. Philosophy of economics: a contemporary introduction / Julian Reiss / Routledge, 2013.
11. Economic Methodology: a historical introduction / Harro Maas, translated by Liz Waters / Routledge, 2014
10. Economic methodology: an inquiry / Sheila C. Dow / Oxford University Press, 2002
9. Economic methodology: understanding economics as a science / Marcel Boumans and John B. Davis / Palgrave Macmillan, 2010
8. The Construction of Social Reality / J. R. Searle / The Free Press, 1995.
7. Philosophy of Social Science 5 ed. / Alexander Rosenberg / Westview Press, 1995.
6. Readings in the Philosophy of Social Science / Michael Martin e Lee C. McIntyre (eds) / MIT Press, 1994.
5. The Philosophy of Social Science. 2a ed. / M. Hollis / Cambridge University Press, 1994.
4. The Social Construction of What? / I. Hacking / Harvard University Press, 1999.
3. Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences / J. Elster / Cambridge University Press, 1989.
2. The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences, 4a ed. / R. Bhaskar / Routledge, 1978 [2015].
1. A Realist Theory of Science, 2a ed. / R. Bhaskar / Verso, 1975 [1997].
Authors:
Reference: null
Year:
Economy, Society, Governance
1. Develop knowledge and analytical skills for a holistic understanding of economic, social and political processes.
2. Develop skills for critical reflection and discussion of epistemological and conceptual fundamentals and for learning to use the analytical tools related to the study of the structure and the dynamic of economic, social and political systems, their evolution and the deliberations that enacted them.
3. Develop skills for critical reflection and discussion of epistemological and conceptual fundamentals related to the analysis of the different modes of action, instrumental and non-instrumental, and the different substantive and formalist perspectives of rationality.
4. Develop skills for analyzing different modes of coordination and the mutual interactions that established between the State, markets, organizations, community.
5. Develop skills for critical reflection, argumentation and autonomous judgement.
1. State, society, markets and organizations: the social and economic system
1.1. Instrumental and non-instrumental modes of action; substantive and formalist perspectives of rationality
1.2. Markets and organizations; transactions, transaction costs and contracts
1.3. Market society and industrial society
1.4 State and public action
1.5. Institutions and the institutionalist perspective
1.6. The Political Economy and the power
2. Governance, institutions and institutional change
2.1. Social orders and the forms of constitutional economy of developed societies
2.2. Action and institutional change
2.3. Path dependences and socioeconomic transformation
2.4. Institutional complementarities and governance
3. Democracy, historical transitions and rights: contemporaneous political economy
3.1. Structural change, historical transitions and the long cycles of capitalism
3.2. Capitalism, Democracy and Welfare State
3.4. Social democracies, economic growth and inequalities.
A avaliação inclui:
frequência e participação nos seminários (35%);
elaboração e apresentação de um trabalho individual sobre um tema da UC (65%).
A avaliação desta UC não contempla a realização de exame escrito final/There is no final written exam.
O instrumento principal de avaliação, o ensaio individual, insere-se nas metodologias de ensino definidas.
Title: 8. STREECK, W. (2010), ?Taking Capitalism Seriously: Toward an Institutionalist Approach t
7. POLANYI, K. (2010), The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of our Time. Boston: Bacomn Press.
6. PASINETTI, L. (1981), Structural Change and Economic Growth. A Theoretical Essay on the Dynamics of the Wealth of Nations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. SCHUMPETER, J. A., (1942), Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, New York: Harper & Row.
4. HIRSCHMAN, A. (1982), ?Rival Interpretations of Market Society: Civilizing, Destructive, or Fee-ble??, Journal of Economic Literature, Volume XX, 1463-1484.
3. ESPING-ANDERSEN, G. (1993), The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Princeton, Princeton University Press.
2. CHANG, H.-J. (2003), Globalisation, Economic Development and the Role of the State, London: Zed Books, Caps 1-3
1. BRUFF, I. (2011), ?What about the Elephant in the Room? Varieties of Capitalism, Varieties in Capitalism?, New Political Economy, June, pp. 1-20.
Authors:
Reference: null
Year:
Title: 20. Streeck, Wolfgang (2010), ?Institutions in History: Bringing Capitalism Back In? In: Morgan, Glenn et al. (eds.), Handbook of Comparative Institutional Analysis, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 659-686.
19. Sen, Amartya (1977), ?Rational Fools?, Philosophy and Public Affairs vol. 6, no. 4: 317-344.
18. Scott, Richard W. (2001), Institutions and Organizations, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
17. Schmidt, V.A. (2009). ?Putting Politics Back into the Political Economy by Bringing the State Back in Yet Again.? World Politics 61 (3): 516-48.
16. Salais Robert et Thévenot Laurent (eds), (1986), Le Travail: marchés, règles, conventions, INSEE, Paris: Economica.
15. Radin, M.J. (1997) Contested Commodities, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
14. Powell, Walter W.; DiMaggio, Paul J. (eds) (1991), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13. March, James G.; Olsen, Johan P. (1989). Rediscovering Institutions, The Organizational Basis of Politics, New York: The Free Press.
12. Karpik, Lucien (2010), Valuing the Unique: The Economics of Singularities, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
11. Joas, H. (1996), The Creativity of Action, Cambridge: Polity Press.
10. Hirschman, Albert O. (1985), ?Against Parsimony: Three Easy Ways of Complicating some Categories of Economic Discourse?, Economics and Philosophy 1: 7-21.
9. FREEMAN, Chris; LOUÇÃ, Francisco (2001), As Time Goes By ? From the Industrial Revolution to the Information Revolution, Oxford: Oxford University Press,.
8. Eymard-Duvernay François (ed), (2006), L?économie des conventions, méthodes et résultats - tome 1: Débats / tome 2 : Développements, Paris: La découverte, collection Recherches.
7. Campbell, John L. (2010), ?Institutional Reproduction And Change? In: Morgan, Glenn et al. (eds.), Handbook of Comparative Institutional Analysis, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 87-115.
6. Bromley, Daniel W. (2006), Sufficient Reason: Volitional Pragmatism and the Meaning of Economic Institutions, Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
5. Boltanski, Luc; Chiapello, Eve (1999), Le nouvel esprit du capitalisme, Paris: Gallimard.
4. Boltanski, Luc; Thévenot, Laurent, (1991), De la justification. Les économies de la grandeur, Paris: Gallimard.
3. Aglietta, Michel (2015), A Theory of Capitalist Regulation: The US Experience, London:Verso.
2. Aglietta, Michel; Rebérioux, Antoine (2015), Dérives du capitalisme financier, Paris: Albin Michel.
1. Aglietta, Michel, Orléan, André (1998), La Monnaie Souveraine, Paris: Odile Jacob.
Authors:
Reference: null
Year:
History of Political Economy
1. To develop skills for critique, argumentation and autonomous judgement.
2. To develop skills for interpretation of texts and works of authors in light of the historical context and their relation with the main traditions and currents of political economy.
3. To develop skills for the identification of the origins and understanding of economic and political ideias present in contemporary controversies.?
1. The main currents of political economy
1.a Classical liberalism and industrial capitalism: Smith, Ricardo, Mill
1.b The nature of modern capitalism: Marx, Durkheim e Weber
1.c Democracy and capitalism in the institutionalist tradition: Veblen, Commons, Polanyi, Kapp
1.d The Great Depression and the economic role of the state: Keynesianism - Keynes, Kalecki and Minsky - and Welfare Economics - Pigou and Stiglitz
1.e Decolonization and development: modernization theories - Rostow and Lewis -, structuralism - Myrdal, Nurske and Hirschman - and dependence theory - Furtado and Prebisch
1.f The neoliberal reaction to state interventionism in political economy: Hayek Friedman, Buchanan and Olson
2. Contemporary debates and their antecedents
2.a Growth and secular stagnation
2.b Money and monetary policy
2.c Technology, labour and employment
2.d Growth and sustainability
2.e Inequalities and growth
2.f Financialization, development and welfare
2.g Ethics and the market??
The teaching methodology in the first part of the syllabus is based on theoretical-practical sessions comprising an introduction by the professor followed by a debate aimed at the analysis of the assigned readings. The second part appeals to the participation of students, involving both introduction to the debate by students? presentations and their engagement in the following discussion. This part involves seminar sessions on four of the topic presented in the syllabus selected by students.
|
To get credit, students must:
- attend sessions and do assigned readings (25%);
- give one seminar presentation (25%); and
- write a paper on the topic of the seminar (50%).
There is no final written exam.
Title: 4. Trigilia, C. (2002), Economic Sociology ? State, Market and Society in Modern Capitalism, Oxford: Blackwell.
3. Milonakis, Dimitris and Ben Fine (2009), From Political Economy to Economics: Method, the social and the historical in the evolution of economic theory, Routledge: London and New York.
2. Kurz, H. and Riemer, J. (2016), Economic Thought: A Brief History, New York: Columbia University Press.
1. Caporaso, J. A. e Levine D. P. (1992), Theories of Political Economy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Authors:
Reference: null
Year:
Title: 31. Smithin, J, (2000), What is Money?, London: Routledge.
30. Summers, L. (2014), ?U.S. Economic Prospects: Secular Stagnation, Hysteresis, and the Zero Lower Bound?, Business Economics, 49(2): 6573.
29. Stiglitz, J., (2012), The Price of Inequality: How Today's Divided Society Endangers Our Future, W. W. Norton & Company
28. Veblen, T. (1904), The Theory of Business Enterprise, New Brunswick: Transaction Books
27. Weber M. (1999), Essays in Economic Sociology, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
26. Smith A. (1776/2014), Inquérito sobre a Natureza e as Causas da Riqueza das Nações, Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.
25. Ricardo, D.(1817/1983), Princípios de Economia Política e de Tributação, Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.
24. Polanyi, K. (1957) ??The Economy as an Instituted Process??, in K. Polanyi, C. Arensberg and H. Pearson (orgs.), Trade and Market in the Early Empires: Economies in History and Theory, Glencoe, Illinois: The Free Press, 243270.
23. Polanyi, K. (1944, 2012), A Grande Transformação As Origens Políticas e Económicas do nosso Tempo, Lisboa: Edições 70.
22. Olson, M. (1965/1998), A Lógica da Acção Colectiva. Bens Públicos e Teoria dos Grupos, Oeiras, Celta Editora.
21. Minsky, H. (1982a), ?The financial Instability Hypothesis: capitalist processes and the behaviour of the economy?, in C. Kindleberger e J.P. Lafargue (eds.), Financial Crises: Theory History and Policy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Mill, J. S. (1909/2017), Principles of Political Economy with some of their Applications to Social Philosophy, London: Longmans, Green and Co. Disponivel em http://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/millprinciplesofpoliticaleconomyashleyed
19. Marx K. (1867?1883, 1990), O Capital: Crítica da Economia Política, Lisboa: Ed. Avante
18. Malthus, T. R. (1836), Principles of Political Economy, London: W. Pickering. Disponivel em http://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/malthusprinciplesofpoliticaleconomy
17. Malm, A. (2016), Fossil Capital: the Rise of the Steam Power and the Roots of Global Warming, London: Verso Books.
16. Lapavitsas, C. (2013),Profiting Without Producing: How Finance Exploits Us All, Londres: Verso Books
15. Keynes, J. M. (1936), ?Concluding notes on the social philosophy towards which the general?, Chap. 24, The General Theory of Employment Interest and Money.
14. Kalecky, M (1943), ?Political Aspects of Full Employment?, Political Quarterly.
13. Jackson T. (2013), Prosperidade sem Crescimento. Lisboa Tinta da China.
12. Innes, A. M. (1914), ?The Credit Theory of Money?, The Banking Law Journal, Vol. 31, Dec./Jan., pp 151168.
11. Hirshman, A.O. (1992),Rival Views of Market Society and Other Recent Essays, Harvard University Press, 1992
10. Hayek, F. (1947), Individualism and Economic Order, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press
9. Gordon, R. (2016), The Rise and Fall of American Growth, Princeton : Princeton University Press.
8. Ford, M. (2015), Rise if robots : Technology and Threat of a Jobless Future, Basic Books.
7. Friedman, M. (1951), ?NeoLiberalism and its Prospects?, Farmand, 17 February 1951, pp. 8993.
6. Durkheim, E. (1897/1967), De la division du travail social, Paris: Les Presses universitaires de France. Disponivel em http://classiques.uqac.ca/classiques/Durkheim_emile/division_du_travail/division_travail.html
5. Commons, J.R.( 1934/1959), Institutional Economics: Its Place In Political Economy, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
4. Cypher, J. (2014), The Process of Economic Development, London: Routledge
3. Buchanan, J and Tullock G. (1962), The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy, disponivel em https://web.archive.org/web/20060610040512/http://econlib.org/library/Buchanan/buchCv3Contents.html
2. Backhouse, R. and Mauro Boianowsky (2016), ?Secular stagnation: The history of a macroeconomic heresy?, European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 23(6): 946970.
1. Anderson, E. (1990), ?The Ethical Limitations of the Market?, Economics & Philosophy, Vol 6, Issue 2, pp. 179205
Authors:
Reference: null
Year:
Seminar on Social Science Research Techniques
1 To understand the main differences between qualitative and quantitative methodologies.
2 To expand the knowledge of methodologies and research techniques deemed relevant for the Ph.D. dissertation work.
3 To apply the knowledge of methodologies and research techniques to the preparation of the Ph.D. dissertation project?????
1 Qualitative and quantitative methodologies: two distinct traditions?
1.1 Distinctive characteristics and internal diversity of qualitative methodologies.
1.2 Distinctive characteristics and internal diversity of quantitative methodologies.
1.3 Main controversies between the two traditions.
2 A specific module on research methods and techniques, to be chosen out of the following possibilities (each one corresponding to 5 ETCS and involving six sessions).
2.1 Network analysis.
2.2. Interviews and qualitative content analysis.
2.3 Econometrical and multivariate statistical analysis.
3 A specific module on research methods and techniques, to be chosen out of the following possibilities (each one corresponding to 5 ETCS and involving six sessions).
3.1 Qualitative Comparative Analysis.
3.2 Case-studies and the comparative method.
3.3 Participatory methodologies.
3.4 Input-Output Analysis: introduction and empirical applications
Assessment will be based on student performance during the optional modules, according to the following parameters:
First independent module: quality of oral intervention during the sessions and readings of support bibliography (20%); accomplishment of an exercise related to the research objectives (30%).
Second independent module: quality of oral intervention during the sessions and readings of support bibliography (20%); accomplishment of an exercise related to the research objectives (30%);
Title: 9. Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative Content Analysis in
8. Schneider, C.Q. & Wagemann, C. (2012) Set-theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Miller, R. and Blair, P. (2009) Input-Output Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Kadushin, C. (2012) Understanding Social networks : theories, concepts and findings, Cambridge
5. Greene, W.H. (2012) Econometric Analysis. New Jersey, Prentice Hall (7th Edition).
4. Goertz, G. & Mahoney, J. (2012) A Tale of Two Cultures: Qualitative and Quantitative Research in the Social Sciences. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
3. Byrne, D. & Ragin, C. (eds.) (2009) The SAGE Handbook of Case-Based Methods. Londres: SAGE.
2. Borgatti,S. P., Everett, M., Johnson, J.C., (2013), Analysing Social Networks, SAGE
1. Becker, H. S. (1998). Tricks of the Trade: How to Think about Your Research while You?re Doing It. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Authors:
Reference: null
Year:
Title: 19. Zuckerman, H. (1972). Interviewing an ultra-elite. The Public Opinion Quartely, 36, 159-175.
18. World Bank (1996). The World Bank Participation Sourcebook. Washington: Environmental Department.
17. Wooldridge, J.M. (2006) Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach. USA, Thomson South-Western.
16. Winthereik, B. R. & Verran, H. (2012). Ethnographic stories as generalizations that intervene. Science Studies, 25(1), 37-51.
15. Wasserman, S., Faust, K., (1994) Social network analysis: methods and apllications, Cambridge, MA, Cambridge University Press
14. Stake, R. (1995). The Art of Case-Study Research. Londres: Sage.
13. Scott, J., Social network analysis: a handbook, London, Sage, 2000
12. Rowe, G. & Frewer, L.J. (2004). Evaluating public participation exercises: a research agenda. Science, Technology and Human Values, 29(4), 512-556.
11. Ragin, C. ([1987] 1989) The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
10. Prell, C., (2012) Social Network Analysis : history, theory and methodology, SAGE
9. Poirier, J., Clapier-Valladon, S. & Raybaut, P. [1983] (1995). Histórias de Vida: Teoria e Prática. Oeiras: Celta.
8. Piette, A. (1996). Ethnographie de l?action: l?observation des details. Paris: Métaillié.
7. Marques, P. and Salavisa, I. (2016) ?Young People and Dualization in Europe: A Fuzzy Set Analysis?, Socio-Economic Review, 0(0): 1-26. Advance Access.
6. Knoke, D. e Yang,2008, S. Social Network Analysis, 2nd ed.,SAGE
5. Hardy, M. & Bryman, A. (2009) The Handbook of Data Analysis. London, Sage Publications.
4. Hanneman, Robert A. and Mark Riddle ( 2005) Introduction to social network methods. Riverside, CA: University of California, Riverside (http://faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/ )
3. Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. [1967] (2002). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Londres: Aldine.
2. Fine, G. A. (1993). Ten lies of ethnography: moral dilemmas of field research. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 22, 167-294.
1. Deakin, H. & Wakefield, K. (2014). Skype interviews: reflections of two PhD researchers. Qualitative Research 14, 603-616.
Authors:
Reference: null
Year:
Transdisciplinary Research Seminar
1.Familiarize the PhD students with current societal issues and challenges at the international, European or Portuguese levels (namely on the domains of the environment, sustainability, financialisation, work, inequalities and social inclusion, digital era, regulation and governance?), and based on current research programmes and recent and ongoing research projects/activities within the research centres associated with the PhD program.
2.Highlight, specifically, the relevance of transdisciplinarity for an improved understanding on the issues and challenges mentioned in 1.
3.Familiarize the PhD students with research methods and practices adequate for addressing issues and challenges mentioned in 1.
4.Provide PhD students the opportunity for debating transdisciplinary research with practising researchers.
1. What is scientific transdisciplinary research?
1.1. Multidisciplinarity, transdiciplinarity, interdisciplinarity.
1.2. Trans- and interdisciplinary research opportunities and challenges.
2. Challenges of research in Social and Human Sciences (SHS) in a changing society.
2.1. Research themes and topics in domains where Political Economy interacts with other SHS (sociology, history, philosophy, anthropology, law, political science).
2.2. Research programs and projects and other transdisciplinary scientific initiatives.
Assessment throughout the semester:
1. Regular and participated intervention in the seminar sessions, which will take place throughout the semester,
with questions that students have prepared based on readings (20%);
2. Written essay containing a summary presentation and commentary on two of the
research projects/activities presented in the Seminar sessions (freely chosen by the doctoral student), highlighting the specific contribution of transdisciplinarity to the development of the project and its results (80%).
The essay should be between 4,000 and 6,000 words long, including any footnotes and excluding
bibliography.
Title: Bibliografia introdutória:
Bernstein, J. H. (2015), Review: Transdisciplinarity: A Review of Its Origins, Development, and Current Issues, Journal of Research Practice, 11 (1); Brandão, T., Gonçalves, M. E., e Reis, J, (2023), A economia política do mundo contemporâneo: revisitando um campo multidisciplinar, Análise Social, LVII, 3, 248, 460-472; Carmo, R. M. (2021), Social inequalities: theories, concepts and problematics, SN Social Sciences, 1:116; Klein, J. T. (2014). Discourses of Transdisciplinarity: Looking back to the future. Futures, 65, pp. 10-16; Stock, P., R. J.F. Burton (2011), Defining Terms for Integrated (Multi-Inter-Trans-Disciplinary) Sustainability Research Sustainability, 3, 1090-1113; Osborne, P. (2015) Problematizing disciplinarity, transdisciplinary problematics. Theory, culture & society, 32(5-6), pp. 3-35.
Authors:
Reference: null
Year:
Title: Bibliografia de apoio sobre a temática da transdisciplinaridade:
A bibliografia de apoio a esta UC será fundamentalmente a que vier a ser indicada pelos Investigadores Responsáveis pela apresentação dos projetos e atividades científicas dos Centros de Investigação.
Authors:
Reference: null
Year:
Research Design and Academic Writing
1.Develop knowledge and skills for the design of a PhD research proposal in the domain of Political Economy;
2.Develop skills for justifying the epistemological and conceptual fundamentals and the methodological choices of the PhD research proposal;
3.Develop skills for critical reflection on the research process;
4.Develop oral and argumentation skills for the presentation of research work;
5.Develop academic writing skills;
6.Develop social and ethical responsibility of the PhD student as a social scientist.
1. The nature and the process of research in the social sciences
1.1. Formulating questions and searching for answers
1.2. State of the art and original contribution
1.3. The ethics of research and of the social scientist
2. PhD research proposal
2.1. Background and research problem
2.2. Literature review and conceptualization
2.3. Methodological strategy
2.4. Research plan and timetable
3. Academic writing
3.1. Styles and publication outlets
3.2. The academic article
3.3. The process of publication in academic journals
4. Communications in scientific meetings?????
Assessment consists of participation (10%); 1st version of PhD proposal (20%); final version of PhD proposal (50%); and proposal of an academic article (20%)
The evaluation of the final version of the PhD proposal will be made by a Jury constituted by a member of the CU, who will be the President of that jury, the supervisor/tutor of the student and a discussant, who may be external to the CU. The supervisor and the discussant will propose the grade, the President will make the final decision.
Title: 6. Feak C. & Swales J. (2009) Telling a Research Story: Writing a Literature Review. Ann Arbor, Michigan, University of Michigan Press
5. Swales, John, Feak, Christine B. (2004) Academic Writing for Graduate Students: Essential Tasks and Skills, Michigan, University of Michigan Press.
4. Hancké, Bob (2009) Intelligent Research Design: A Guide for Beginning Researchers in the Social Sciences, Nova Iorque, Oxford University Press.
3. Dunleavy, Patrick (2003) Authoring a PhD: How to Plan, Draft, Write and Finish a Doctoral Thesis or Dissertation, Nova Iorque, Palgrave Macmillan.
2. Creswell, John W. (2014) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches, 4ª Edição, Los Angeles, SAGE Publications.
1. Booth, Wayne C., Colomb, Gregory G., Williams, Joseph M., Bizup, Joseph (2016) The Craft of Research, 4ª Edição, Chicago e Londres, University of Chicago Press.
Authors:
Reference: null
Year:
Title: -
Authors:
Reference: null
Year:
Research Seminar and Tutorial
The aim is to develop the following skills and abilities:
1.The skills and knowledge required for a PhD thesis in Political Economy.
2.The ability to discuss the theoretical frameworks and methodological options involved in the PhD thesis.
3.The ability to critically reflect on the research process.
4.The ability to communicate and develop arguments on the research carried out.
The nature of this unit does not make it relevant to define programmatic contents with specific topics since the work to be done is primarily individual. However, the following topics will be discussed, in tutorial or collective sessions:
1. Discussion of the most relevant papers in the thesis? area
2. Discussion of the research methods being used by the students
3. Presentation by each student of his/her research work
Given the nature of this unit, the grading process is more formal than substantial. It consists in a single component:
- Presentation by the student of the theoretical work carried out and of the methodological options (100%).
There is no final exam.
Title: 4. Swales, John, Feak, Christine B. (2004) Academic Writing for Graduate Students: Essential Tasks and Skills, Michigan, University of Michigan Press.
3. Creswell, John W. (2014) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches, Fourth Edition, Los Angeles, SAGE Publications.
2. Bryman, Alan (2012) Social Research Methods, Londres, Oxford University Press.
1. Booth, Wayne C., Colomb, Gregory G., Williams, Joseph M., Bizup, Joseph (2016) The Craft of Research, Fourth Edition, Chicago e Londres, University of Chicago Press.
Authors:
Reference: null
Year:
Title: N.a
Authors:
Reference: null
Year:
Industrial, Innovation and Research Policy
This course is aimed at fulfilling the following learning objectives:
1) Provide students with practical and procedural learning tools on the role of the State in the fields of industrial, innovation and research policies.
2) Provide students with tools for critical reflection on the diversity of perspectives on industrial, innovation and research policies.
3) Develop skills in Applied Political Economy through specific cases of policy measures in the fields of industrial, innovation and research.
1. Introduction
a. Key concepts
b. Relations between science, technology and innovation
2. Evolution of III Policies
b. Evolution of industrial policy
a. Evolution of research and innovation policies
c. Case study: the intellectual property policy
3. Comparative perspectives
a. The scientific and technological performance of nations
b. National innovation systems
c. Developmental States
d. Social studies of science and technology
e. Case study: III policies in Portugal
4. Political Economy of III Policies
a. The political economy of industrial policy
b. The political economy of the Washington Consensus
c. The global governance of research and innovation
d. Case study: the associated laboratories in Portugal
5. Prospective and major challenges for III policies
Individual essay: 100%
Final exam: 100%
Title: Stubbs (2009). What ever happened to the East Asian Developmental State? The unfolding debate. The Pacific Review, 22(1), 1-22.
Schot & Steinmueller (2018), 'Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change?, Research Policy, 47(9): 1554-1567.
Lundvall (2007). National innovation systems?analytical concept and development tool. Industry and innovation, 14(1), 95-119.
Confraria et al. (2017). Determinants of citation impact: A comparative analysis of the Global South versus the Global North. Research Policy, 46, 265?279
Chang (1994). State, institutions and structural change. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 5(2), 293-313.
Boldrin & Levine (2013). The Case Against Patents. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(1), 3-22.
Andreoni & Chang (2019). The political economy of industrial policy: Structural interdependencies, policy alignment and conflict management. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 48, 136-150.
Authors:
Reference: null
Year:
Title: Veloso, L. e Carmo, R.M. (eds.) (2011). As estruturas sociais da economia. Lisboa: Mundos Sociais.
Shinn, T. (2008). Instrumentation Between Science, State and Industry. Research-Technology and Cultural Change: Instrumentation, Genericity, Transversality. Oxford: The Bardwell Press.
Shinn, T. (2002). ?The triple helix and new production of knowledge: prepackaged thinking on science and technology?. Social Studies of Science, 32(4), pp. 599-614.
Shapin, S. (2008). The Scientific Life. A Moral History of a Late Modern Vocation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Salavisa, I. (coord.) (2007). Casos de Sucesso em I&D: Networking e Transferência de Conhecimento. Lisboa: Edição IESE.
Rodrigues, M.L; Heitor, M. (2015). 40 Anos de Políticas de Ciência e de Ensino Superior. Coimbra: Almedina
Ribeiro, F.; Peleteiro, M.C. & Silva, G. (2007). Economia do conhecimento e entidades do sistema científico e tecnológico. Porto: SPI.
Radosevic, S. & Yoruk, E. (2014). ?Are there global shifts in the world science base? Analysing the catching up and falling behind of world regions?. Scientometrics101 (3), 1897?1924.
Polanyi, M. (1962). ?The republic of science: its political and economic theory?, Minerva, 1:54-74.
Pinto, H.; Santos Pereira, T. (2013). ?Efficiency of innovation systems in Europe: an institutional approach to the diversity of national profiles?, European Planning Studies, 21(6).
Pinto, H. (2013). ?Knowledge transfer and the ?academic enterprise? in the Algarve: contributions from social studies of science and technology to the understanding of university-firm relations?. Spatial and Organizational Dynamics Discussion Papers, 12.
Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D?Este, P., Fini, R.,Geuna, A., Grimaldi, R., Hughes, A., Krabel, S., Kitson, M., Llerena, P., Lissoni, F.,Salter, A. & Sobrero, M. (2013). ?Academic engagement and commercialisation: a review of the literature on university?industry relations?. Research Policy 42,423?442.
Patrício, T. e Conceição, Cristina P.(orgs.) (2015). Redes e colaborações científicas. Lisboa: Mundos Sociais.
Ornston, D., & Vail, M. I. (2016). ?The Developmental State in Developed Societies: Power, Partnership, and Divergent Patterns of Intervention in France and Finland?. Comparative Politics, 49(1), 1-21.
Oliveira, L. (2008). Sociologia da inovação: a construção social das técnicas e dos mercados. Oeiras: Celta.
Nelson, R.R. (2005). ?The roles of research in universities and public labs in economic catch-up?. In Santangelo, G. (Org.), Technological Change and Economic Catch-Up. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Mazzucato, M. (2013). The Entrepreneurial State. Debunking Public Vs. Private Myths In Innovation. Londres: Anthem Press.
Mamede, R.P.; Godinho, M.M. & Simões, V.C. (2014). ?Assessment and challenges of industrial policies in Portugal: is there a way out of the ?stuck in the middle? trap??. In A. Teixeira, E. Silva e R. Mamede (Orgs.), Structural Change, Competitiveness and Industrial Policy: Painful Lessons from the European Periphery. London: Routledge.
Lundvall, B. Å. (2007). ?National innovation systems?analytical concept and development tool?. Industry and innovation, 14(1), 95-119.
Lissoni, F. (2013). ?Academic patenting in Europe: a reassessment of evidence and research practices?. Industry and Innovation. 20, 379?384.
Leftwich, A. (1995). ?Bringing politics back in: towards a model of the developmental state?. Journal of Development Studies, 31(3), 400-427.
Law, J. (1987). ?Technology and Heterogeneous Engineering: the case of Portuguese Expansion?, The Social construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. Cambridge: The MIT Press, pp. 111-134.
Latour, B. (2004). Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Harvard University Press: Cambridge.
King, D.A. (2004). ?The scientific impact of nations?. Nature 430 (6997), 311?316.
Jasanoff, S. et. al. (1995). Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Cambridge: MIT PRESS.
Godinho, M.M. (2007). ?Indicadores de C&T, Inovação e Conhecimento: Onde Estamos? Para Onde Vamos??, Análise Social XLII (182), pp. 239-274.
Godinho, M.M. & Mamede, R.P. (2016). ?Southern Europe in crisis: industrial policy les-sons from Italy and Portugal?. Economia e Politica Industriale/ Journal of Industri-al and Business Economics 43(3), pp.331-336.
Magalhães (orgs.), Encontro de Saberes: Três Gerações de Bolseiros da Gulbenkian. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian (273-286).
Godinho, M. M. (2006). ?Os Limites da Privatização da Ciência?. In Ana Tostões, E. Arantes Oliveira, J. M. Pinto Paixão e Pedro Kentikelenis et al.(2016) IMF conditionality and development policy space, 1985?2014, Review of International Political Economy, 23:4, 543-582
Godin, B. & Lane, J.P. (2012). ?A century of talks on research: what happened to development and production??. International Journal Transitions and Innovation Systems, 2 (1): 5-13.
Gibbons, M.; Limoges, C.; Nowotny, H.; Schwartzman, S.; Scott, P. & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
Gaspar, J.; Gago, M.M., Simões, A. (2009). ?Scientific life under the Portuguese dictatorial regime (1929-1954): the communities of geneticists and physicists?. Journal of History of Science and Technology, 3.
Fine, B.; Saraswati, J. & Tavasic, D. (Orgs.) (2013), Beyond the developmental state: Industrial policy into the 21st century. Londres: Pluto.
Fernandes, J. (2007). A responsabilidade social na comunicação da ciência nos laboratórios de Estado portugueses. Dissertação de doutoramento em Ciências da Comunicação. FCSH-UNL.
Fagerberg, J. et. al. (2004). The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fagerberg, J. (2017). ?Innovation Policy: Rationales, Lessons and Challenges?. Journal of Economic Surveys, 31(2), 497-512.
Etzkowitz, H. & Leydesdorff , L. (2000). ?The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and ?Mode 2? to a Triple Helix of university?industry?government relations?, Research Policy, 29, pp. 109-123.
Etzkowitz, H. & Leydesdorf, L. (eds.). (1997). Universities and the Global Knowledge Economy. A Triple-Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. London and Washington: Pinter Publishers.
Confraria, H.; Wang, L. & Godinho, M.M. (2017). ?Determinants of citation impact: A comparative analysis of the Global South versus the Global North?. Research Policy (46) 1, 265-279.
Chan, S., Lutz, H., Lam, D., & Clark, C. (Eds.). (2016). Beyond the developmental state: East Asia?s political economies reconsidered. Springer.
Cartaxo, R. & Godinho, M. (2017). ?How institutional nature and available resources determine the performance of Technology Transfer Offices?. Industry and Innovation (publicado online em janeiro 2017).
Caraça, J., Lundvall, B. Å., & Mendonça, S. (2009). The changing role of science in the innovation process: From Queen to Cinderella?. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(6), 861-867.
Callon, M. (1986). ?The Sociology of an Actor-Network: the Case of the Electric Vehicle?, In Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology, Sociology of Science in the Real World, MacMillan Press, London, p. 358-376.
Breznitz, D., & Ornston, D. (2016). ?The politics of partial success: fostering innovation in innovation policy in an era of heightened public scrutiny?. Socio-Economic Re-view, mww018
Bijker, W. et. al. (1987) (eds.). The Social Construction of Technological Systems. New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. Cambridge (Mass.). MIT Press.
Bijker, W. E.; Law, J. (eds.) (1992). Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. USA: MIT Press.
Bijker, W. E. (ed.) (2007). Structures of Scientific Collaboration Inside Technology. Cambridge. Massachusetts, London: The MIT Press.
Arqué-Castells, P.; Cartaxo, R.M.; García-Quevedo, J.; Godinho, M.M. (2016). ?Royalty sharing, effort and invention in universities: Evidence from Portugal and Spain?. Research Policy 45, 1858?1872
Authors:
Reference: null
Year:
Thesis in Political Economy, Interdisciplinary Phd
1. To design and develop original research that meets requirements of academic quality and considers the social and ethical responsibility of the PhD student as a social scientist, contributing to the expansion of the frontiers of knowledge in Political Economy and to its diffusion;
2. To develop skills for critical reflection on the research process;
3. To develop oral and written argumentative skills for the presentation of research work namely to peers and the academic community (for instance, in national or international scientific conferences and publications) and the public in general.
Due to the specificities of this CU, no syllabus is provided; it will be set based on research projects developed by PhD students and on the guidance of PhD supervisor(s). The supervision of the students? research projects will be accomplished in articulation with other CU devoted to research and to the regular monitoring of the students? research projects, namely Research Design and Academic Writing, Transdisciplinary Research Seminar, Research Seminar and Tutorial and the Research Seminars. This course aims to develop theoretical and methodological skills and deepen empirical knowledge in the domain of national and international political economy, which enable students to relate domains which are usually analyzed in separate and to develop their own original research.
Evaluation processTeaching methodology comprises tutorials for supervising the development of the research project as well as autonomous work from students. Students? participation in scientific meetings and other forums of discussion of ideas (conferences, seminars, workshops, summer schools, ?) in plural and flourishing academic environments will be encouraged.
BibliographyTitle: De acordo com o projecto de investigação de cada estudante / According to the research project of each student.
Authors:
Reference: null
Year:
Title: De acordo com o projecto de investigação de cada estudante / According to the research project of each student.
Authors:
Reference: null
Year:
Research Seminar
Research Seminar
The CU has the following learning outcomes:
1.To develop the student?s ability to reflect upon their research;
2.To promote the student?s ability to develop their own arguments and ideas;
3.To improve the student?s communication skills, both oral and written;
4.To better internationalize the doctoral program by organizing research seminars with international lecturers that will address recent advances in the field of Political Economy.
Due to the specificities of this CU, no syllabus is provided. Each year, this unit will allow students to present their undergoing projects.
Throughout the year students will present their work in several research seminars and will be asked to participate in the organisation. All students should also comment the other colleagues? presentations. Professors involved in the doctoral program and other researchers will also be invited to attend the seminars and comment on the presentations.
The seminars with guest lecturers will be organised by the Professors.
Assessment consist of the following elements:
Attendance, organisation and participation in the research seminars (20%)
Presentation of the undergoing projects in the research seminars (40%)
To comment the other students? presentations (30%)
Critical analysis of each guest lecture (10%)
There is no final written exam.
Title: Dada a natureza desta UC não há bibliografia comum / Given the nature of this UC there is no common bibliography
Authors:
Reference: null
Year:
Title: Dada a natureza desta UC não há bibliografia comum / Given the nature of this UC there is no common bibliography
Authors:
Reference: null
Year:
Thesis in Political Economy, Interdisciplinary Phd
Recommended optative
Optional courses will only be held if they achieve a minimum number of enrollments.
1st semester
00961 | Public Policy Research: the Comparative Method (ESPP | PP)
03377 | Economic Sociology (Di) (ESPP | Soc)
03378 | Theories of Modernity and Development (ECSH | EconP)
03379 | Development Policy and Politics (ECSH | EconP)
03380 | Factors of Economic Development (ESPP | His)
03381 | Applied Econometric of Public Policy (IBS | Ecot)
03382 | Law, Economy and Politics: New Challenges (ECSH | Dir)
03383 | Economy, Law and Politics in Recent Theories of Society (ISCTE | CS)
03384 | Industrial, Innovation and Research Policy (ECSH | EconP)
03385 | City and Citizenship: Contemporary Perspectives (ESPP | Soc)
03386 | Urbanism, Territoriality and Public Space (ESPP | Soc)
03387 | Geopolitics of Peace and Conflict (ESPP | RI)