"The program is detailed in the following CP:
• CP1: Principles of BIM project coordination: standardization, information requirements, collaboration and interoperability.
• CP2: BIM Execution Plan (BEP): structure, preparation and implementation to ensure effective coordination and collaboration in response to Exchange Information Requirements (EIR).
• CP3: BIM uses for project management: Coordination and Compatibility of models, Quantification, Budgeting and Cost Engineering, deliverable management and Handover.
• CP4: Information management in BIM projects: workflows, data exchange, configuration and management of Common Data Environments (CDE) in accordance with international standards.
• CP5: BIM maturity assessment: tools and methodologies to measure and improve the implementation of BIM in projects and organizations.
• CP6: Implementation of BIM procedures and protocols: good practices, challenges and strategies for effective adoption in AECO organizations."

"The assessment takes place throughout the semester and ensures that all students develop proficiency in essential BIM uses, combining individual practical tests and a collaborative implementation project to consolidate information management and collaboration in BIM environments.
1. Practical Tests (40%, individual)
Students perform individual practical mini-tests in a computer laboratory that assess fundamental applied skills:
• Configuration and management of a Common Data Environment (CDE), including structuring folders, implementing file naming, access permissions, versioning and approval flows.
• Compatibility of specialty models, identification and resolution of interferences.
• Extraction of quantities and cost analysis, applying BIM uses of quantification and cost engineering.
• Verification of information conformity, ensuring adherence to project standards and requirements.
2. Collaborative BIM Implementation Project (60%, in group)
For 4 weeks, students participate in a simulated project, structured in teams that assume different roles in the implementation of BIM. The project takes place in phases, ensuring that all students experience the challenges of various stakeholders in the process:
• Week 1: BIM Definition and Planning – Preparation of the BIM Execution Plan (BEP), definition of workflows and organization of the CDE.
• Week 2: Information Management and Coordination – Model compatibility, interference analysis and collaborative management in the CDE.
• Week 3: Data Extraction and Decision Support – Application of BIM uses for quantification and cost engineering.
• Week 4: Assessment and Final Presentation – Final adjustments to the BEP, review of the CDE management and delivery of a technical report, presentation and discussion of the project.
Each student will go through different roles and responsibilities to develop a holistic view of implementing BIM in a real project.
UC Assessment Criteria
• Practical tests: Assessment of proficiency and accuracy in CDE configuration and management, model compatibility, data extraction and compliance with BIM standards.
• Collaborative project: Assessment of clarity and coherence in the implementation of the BEP, effectiveness of the organization, adaptability in the application of BIM uses and quality of the analysis presented in the final phase.
• A minimum grade of 9.5 in each component is mandatory.
Due to the practical nature of the UC, there is no room for assessment by Exam.
"

Mandatory

"•ISO 19650-1 e ISO 19650-2 – Organization and digitization of information about buildings and civil engineering works, including building information modelling (BIM) – Information management using building information modelling – Part 1: Concepts and principles; Part 2: Delivery phase of the assets. Genebra. •EN 17412-1 – Building Information Modelling – Level of Information Need – Part 1: Concepts and principles. Bruxelas: CEN. •Pennsylvania State University. (n.d.). BIM Project Execution Planning Guide – BIM Uses. Retrieved from https://bim.psu.edu/uses/ •Pennsylvania State University. (n.d.). BIM Project Execution Planning Guide, Version 3. https://bim.psu.edu/ •buildingSMART Portugal (2024). Exchange Information Requirements (EIR). https://buildingsmart.pt/recursos/ •Eastman, C., Teicholz, P., Sacks, R., & Liston, K. (2018). BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Designers, Engineers, Contractors, and Facility Managers (3rd ed.). Hoboken: Wiley."

Optional

"The course content is as follows:

CP1. Introduction to software development for construction.

CP2. Artificial Intelligence tools to support development: code generation, debugging, and automation.

CP3. API fundamentals: structure, operation, and practical application.

CP4. Using Autodesk Revit APIs: customizing processes and creating simple automations.

CP5. Introduction to Autodesk Platform Services: integration and interoperability between digital tools.

CP6. Incremental and collaborative work methodologies: best practices in software development, distribution, use, and maintenance of IT tools, and integration into multidisciplinary teams.

Following the course ""Scripting and Parametric Design,"" the programming language used is Python."

"Assessment is semester-long (ALS), with no exam. ALS has two components:
1 - Individual exercises assigned in class and completed in the following weeks, with a weight of 35%. 2 - Group project of up to 3 students, in which each group of students selects a technology or tool, explores it, and applies it to a specific problem, previously approved by the instructor. Projects that address real needs of student organizations are prioritized. Grades are 35% (project), 15% (report), and 15% (discussion).

The minimum grade in each component of the individual work and the group project is 9.5 out of 20."

Mandatory

"Sawhney, A. et al., Construction 4.0: An Innovation Platform for the Built Environment, Routledge 2020, ISBN 9780367027308. Borrmann, A. et al. (eds). Building information modeling: technology foundations and industry practice. Springer 2018, ISBN 9783319928616. Seaton, H., The Construction Technology Handbook: Making Sense of Artificial Intelligence and Beyond, Wiley, 2021, ISBN 9781119719953."" That Open Company. (n.d.). Retrieved 2024/12/27, from https://thatopen.com/ Autodesk. (n.d.). Revit APIs. Autodesk Platform Services. Retrieved 2024/12/27, from https://aps.autodesk.com/developer/overview/revit Autodesk. (n.d.). Autodesk Platform Services. Autodesk. Retrieved 2024/12/27, from https://aps.autodesk.com/?utm_source"

Optional

The syllabus of the curricular unit is designed to provide students with a solid understanding of the principles, standards and practical tools that support digital collaboration in the construction sector, from a perspective of interoperability and neutrality in the use of software.
CP1. OpenBIM fundamentals, including interoperability, IFC history and alignment with international standards, such as the ISO 19650 series (BIM collaboration), EN ISO 7817 (Level of Information Need) and ISO 12006 (Information Classification).
CP2. Collaborative management in openBIM projects, including the use of BCF for communication and alignment with methodologies based on ISO 19650.
CP3. Collaborative management in openBIM projects including the use of BCF for communication.
CP4. Generation of IFC models in accordance with contractual and legal requirements and licensing processes using proprietary software and validation and correction tools, such as Blender/Bonsai.

The assessment of the curricular unit takes place throughout the semester and is made up of two distinct components: a theoretical component (1), which prepares students for the buildingSMART Foundations exam, and a practical component (2), which develops applied skills in interoperability and openBIM.
1.Theoretical Component (40%)
- It consists of carrying out an individual written test, focused on the fundamentals of openBIM and the key concepts covered in the curricular unit, aligned with the contents of the buildingSMART Foundations exam.
- This test will be carried out on the date of the first exam and can be repeated in the second phase, if necessary.
- A minimum grade of 9.5 is required in this component to pass the curricular unit.
2. Practical Component (60%)
- It consists of developing an individual project that simulates a realistic scenario, based on federated models provided by the teacher.
- Each student will receive a specific set of demands and requirements that they must meet, developing a complete workflow.
The project will include:
- Construction of digital models aligned with the requirements provided.
- Use of practical tools for data management, interoperability and information validation.
- Demonstration of the workflow developed through:
- A technical report, detailing the steps followed, tools used and results obtained.
- Completing a Common Data Environment (CDE) containing all elements of the workflow, including validated data, formats and tools used and final results.
- The project is presented through a video of up to 6 minutes, explaining how the workflow works.
The final grade will be calculated based on the weights of the two components, and it is necessary to reach a minimum grade of 9.5 in both for approval. There is no final exam, since the assessment throughout the semester covers the theoretical and practical objectives of the UC.

Mandatory

"- ISO. (2018). ISO 19650-1 e 2: Organization and digitization of information about buildings and civil engineering works, including building information modelling (BIM) – Information management using building information modelling – Part 1: Concepts and principles e Part 2: Delivery phase of the assets. - ISO. (2020). ISO 12006-2 e 3: Building construction – Organization of information about construction works . - European Committee for Standardization. (2020). EN 17412-1: Building Information Modelling – Level of Information Need – Part 1: Concepts and principles. - Borrmann, A., König, M., Koch, C., & Beetz, J. (Eds.). (2018). Building Information Modeling: Technology Foundations and Industry Practice. Springer. - Eichler, S., Hiete, M., Kaiser, A., Rech, B., & Winkler, P. (2024). BIMcert Handbook: Basic Knowledge openBIM. TU Wien. - BuildingSMART International. https://www.buildingsmart.org/. "

Optional

The course content introduces students to the Dynamo and Grasshopper visual programming tools, and allows for the exploration of complex shapes and workflow optimization. To equip students with these skills, the following course content is considered:

CP1: Introduction to visual programming, overview of Dynamo and Grasshopper, basic concepts and interface;

CP2: Generation of shapes and models through visual scripts with practical applications;

CP3: Potential of automation and data management;

CP4: Introduction to programming in Python in Dynamo and Grasshopper, PyRevit and RhinoInsideRevit;

CP5: Exploration and potential of calculations and simulation in parametric models, with subsequent extraction and manipulation of information;

CP6: Strategies for optimizing workflows through automation with practical examples and case studies.

In this course, Semester-Based Assessment is used, without a final exam. This strategy aligns with the Iscte-Sintra learning methodology, promoting autonomous work and task-based learning, which encourages students to conceive, develop, and build practical solutions to real-world problems.

Assessment will be conducted through four individual project deliverables throughout the semester:

The first deliverable will involve developing a visual script to generate a structure for a building or artwork.

The second deliverable will involve the continued development of the same script to generate other elements of the building or artwork, such as facades, prestressing systems, construction details, or others.

The third deliverable will involve using PyRevit or the RhinoInsideRevit plugin to create a Python script for modifying specific elements and/or automation. The fourth and final deliverable will be related to extracting information from the models, performing calculations and simulations, and demonstrating the optimization of the developed process versus the process without the use of scripting for Parametric Design.

None of the individual assessments can have a grade lower than 8 points. The four assessments have the same weight in relation to the final grade (25%), and it is necessary to achieve a minimum grade of 9.5 points in the weighted average to pass the course.

There is no final exam, given the extremely practical nature of the course and since the assessment throughout the semester ensures the fulfillment of its theoretical and practical objectives.

Mandatory

"Bachman, D. (2017). Grasshopper: Visual Scripting For Rhinoceros 3d. South Norwalk: INDUSTRIAL PRESS INC.,U.S. . Collins, J. (2024). Case Studies in Parametric Design - A Guide to Visual Scripting in Architecture. London: Routledge. Halim, A. (2022). Dynamo for Autodesk® Revit®: Design, automate and exploit data . Ahmed Halim. Himmelreich, K., Martín-Herrer, A., & Moreu, I. (2022). Beyond Dynamo: Python manual for Revit. Kevin Himmelreich. Roberti, F., & Ferreira, D. (2021). Increasing Autodesk Revit Productivity for BIM Projects: A practical guide to using Revit workflows to improve productivity and efficiency in BIM projects. Birmingham: Packt Publishing. Sgambelluri, M. (2020). Dynamo and Grasshopper for Revit Cheat Sheet Reference Manual. Marcello Sgambelluri. Silveira, S. J. (2023). Dynamo for Autodesk Revit: Simple and Practical . Samuel João da Silveira. Spiegelhalter, T., & Andia, A. (2014). Post-Parametric Automation in Design and Construction. London: Artech House."

Optional

"CP1: Introduction to digital construction management: fundamental concepts, BIM methodologies, and emerging technologies such as Reality Capture, Computer Vision, Artificial Intelligence, and Automation.
CP2: Information needs and value extraction from the perspective of the Client and Contractor in the commercial, preparation and planning, execution, and handover phases.
CP3: Construction planning and control: strategies for preparation, reporting, and control of construction.
CP4: Collaborative platforms in the cloud: information integration, communication between stakeholders; support for data-driven decision making with Power BI.
CP5: Modular construction and prefabrication: concepts, advantages, challenges, and impact on project management and digital workflows.
CP6: Strategies for the adoption and implementation of digital technologies and innovation in construction companies: challenges, best practices, analysis of real cases, and methodologies for digital transition in the sector."

"The assessment of this curricular unit follows the semester-long modality and is based on the completion of an implementation project, carried out in groups, which allows students to apply the knowledge acquired in the digital management of construction and in the adoption of innovative methodologies, such as modular construction and prefabrication. Given its practical nature, the UC does not have a Final Exam.
1. Implementation Project (100%, in groups)
Students develop a group project that consists of defining and applying a strategy for a specific and well-defined problem. The project must include:
• Analysis of a scenario, preferably real, identifying challenges in a task, analysis of possible solutions and selection of one of them.
• Definition of an implementation plan, including technical, economic and cultural analysis.
• Testing of real implementation or through interviews and simulations.
• Preparation of a technical report, detailing the processes, information flows and decision-making, measured or expected impact and difficulties.

• Final presentation, in a synchronous session, where the applicability and learning outcomes are openly discussed.
2. Evaluation Criteria
The project will be evaluated based on the following criteria:
• Critical analysis and justification (30%) – Clarity in identifying problems and depth of analysis of digital solutions.
• Relevance and innovation of the proposal (30%) – Effective application of the methodologies and technologies explored.
• Quality of the technical report (20%) – Structure, coherence, and depth of the analysis.
• Practical demonstration and presentation (20%) – Clarity in the analysis and presentation of results and conclusions.

3. Feedback and Progression
Throughout the semester, students will have follow-up sessions and continuous feedback from instructors, ensuring the necessary guidance for the development of the project and allowing for adjustments.

Final presentations are commented on by professionals invited to the discussions."

Mandatory

"BUILD UP. (n.d.). Overview Article: Digital Transformation of the Built Environment and Construction 4.0. BUILD UP. Choi, H.-W., Kim, H.-J., Kim, S.-K., & Na, W. S. (2023). An overview of drone applications in the construction industry. Drones, 7(8), 515. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones7080515 Li, F., Laili, Y., Chen, X., Lou, Y., Wang, C., Yang, H., Gao, X., & Han, H. (2023). Towards big data driven construction industry. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 35, 100483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2023.100483 Ghaffar, S. H., Mullett, P., Pei, E. & Roberts, J. (2022). Innovation in construction: A practical guide to transforming the construction industry. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95798-8 Bertram, N., Fuchs, S., Mischke, J., Palter, R., Strube, G., & Woetzel, J. (2019). Modular construction: From projects to products. McKinsey & Company."

Optional

The program contents of this UC, aimed at students with no prior training in the subject, offer a solid foundation in sustainability in the construction and role of digital tools.

CP1. Principles of Sustainable Construction: Exploration of the life cycle of materials and projects, and analysis of linear and circular production models.
CP2. Environmental Policies and Certifications: European policies, voluntary certifications and introduction to the Level(s) methodology.
CP3. Environmental Performance Assessment: Calculation of energy, water performance and GHG emissions throughout the life cycle, with analysis of challenges and limitations.
CP4. Digital Technologies: Use of BIM processes and other digital tools to optimize environmental calculations and reports.

Assessment throughout the semester is used without a final exam, due to the practical nature of the UC. In line with Iscte-Sintra's learning methodology, which promotes student initiative and autonomous work, the assessment consists of an Integrative Project developed in a group and Individual Discussion.
Integrative Project (80%, in group)
- Groups of 3/4 students.
- Based on BIM models of buildings provided by partners, or from previous UCs ​​of the degree.
- It is developed in three phases:
_Phase 1 - LCA of the building including: calculation of initial and embedded carbon, based on the models; estimation of energy and water consumption.
Each group proposes an innovative methodology for verifying the criteria of an environmental certification scheme, between Level(s), LiderA, BREAM or LEED, taking advantage of BIM models. Examples: reporting of waterproofing areas, estimating consumption based on automated analysis of equipment and occupations.
_Phase 2 - Adaptation of the project and models to improve environmental performance.
_Phase 3 - Repetition of analyzes and reporting of improvements achieved.
Individual Discussion (20%)
- In Individual Discussion, the student justifies and defends the group project options and demonstrates mastery of concepts, knowledge and techniques.
Approval
Weighted average equal to or greater than 9.5 and minimum grade of 8.0 in each component.
The use of AI tools must be identified and justified.

Mandatory

"Cheshire, D. (2016). Building Revolutions: Applying the Circular Economy to the Built Environment. RIBA Publishing. ISBN 9781859466452. USGBC. (2024). LEED v4.1 Building Design and Construction Guide. U.S. Green Building Council. . BRE Global Ltd. (2022). BREEAM International - New Construction, Version 6.0: Technical Manual. BRE. Dodd, N., Donatello, S., & Cordella, M. (2021). Level(s) – Quadro comum da União Europeia para os indicadores principais de sustentabilidade dos edifícios de escritórios e residenciais: Manual de Utilização 1: Introdução ao quadro comum Level(s) (v. 1.1). . Resende, R., & Parece, S. (2024). Desafios do carbono incorporado e da avaliação de ciclo de vida nos edifícios. In N. Costa et al. (Eds.), Guia de formação em arquitetura bioclimática e eficiência energética nos Açores (pp. 43–52). Ponta Delgada: Ordem dos Arquitectos – Secção Regional dos Açores. ISBN: 978-972-8897-69-7."

Optional

"Future Built. (2024). https://www.futurebuilt.no/english. Heisel, F. (2022). Building Better - Less - Different: Circular Construction and Circular Economy. Birkhäuser. ISBN: 978-3-0356-2109-9. Cheshire, D. (2016). Building Revolutions: Applying the Circular Economy to the Built Environment. RIBA Publishing. ISBN 9781859466452. Pinheiro, M. D. (2006). Ambiente e Construção Sustentável. Amadora: Instituto do Ambiente. ISBN: 972-8577-32-X. Dodd, N., Donatello, S., & Cordella, M. (2021). Level(s) – Quadro comum da União Europeia para os indicadores principais de sustentabilidade dos edifícios de escritórios e residenciais: Manual de Utilização 1: Introdução ao quadro comum Level(s) (v. 1.1). Pinheiro, M. D. (2019). LiderA: Sistema voluntário para a sustentabilidade dos ambientes construídos (v4.00a). Lisboa: Universidade Técnica de Lisboa. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.36114.40647. Röck, M., Sørensen, A., Tozan, B., Steinmann, J., Horup, L. H., Le Den, X., & Birgisdottir, H. (2022). Towards Embodied Carbon Benchmarks for Buildings in Europe: #2 Setting the Baseline: A Bottom-Up Approach. Rambøll. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5895050. Bartels, N., Höper, J., Theißen, S., Wimmer, R. (2023). Application of the BIM Method in Sustainable Construction. Status Quo of Potential Applications in Practice. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12759-5."

S1 Introduction, methodology, and initial definitions of Digital Transformation
S2 The Digital Revolution and its impacts
S3 Digital Technologies and Business Models
S4 Two Case Studies on Digital Transformation
S5 Digital Transformation Management
S6 Third Case Study on Digital Transformation
S7 Conclusions and Final Considerations
S8 Individual Development of a Digital Transformation Case Study

This course involves Periodic Assessment, not including a Final Exam. The discussion of case studies by student groups will account for 30% of the final grade (grade assigned to the group and reflected in all its members). 10% for each case. The case proposal will count for 30%. The test is conducted individually and will count for 40%. There will be a minimum grade required for the test (9.5 points).
Assessment moments will occur during the resolution of group case studies, individual case proposals, and the test will be conducted at the end.
Students are required to actively participate in forums, with a minimum participation in at least 6 of them considered necessary for each student. Failure to participate in this minimum number of forums will result in a penalty of 5% of the final grade obtained.

Mandatory

Carapuça,R.,Revolução Digital: Quando Tudo é Possível.Glaciar/Fundação Luso-Americana para o Desenvolvimento,2018 M.Wade,D.Bonnet,T.Yokoi,N.Obwegeser,H.Digital,Best Practices to Implement and Accelerate your Business Transformation,McGraw-Hill,2021 J.Loucks,J.Macauley,Andy Noronha,and Michael Wade,Digital Vortex: How Today's Market Leaders Can Beat Disruptive Competitors at Their Own Game; IMD - International Institute for Management Development,2016 S.Marshall,The Story of the Computer,a Technical and Business History,2015 G.G.Parker,M.W.Van Alstyne,Sangeet Paul Choudary,Platform Revolution - How Networked Markets are Transforming The Economy - and How to Make Them Work for You.WW Norton & Company,2016 E.Schaeffer,D.Sovie,Reinventing the Product: How to Transform your Business and Create Value in the Digital Age,Kogan Page,2019 A.Oliveira,The Digital Mind,How Science is Redefining Humanity,MIT Press,2017 Measuring the Digital Transformation.A Roadmap for the Future,OECD,2019

Optional

Yuval Noah Harari, Sapiens, A Brief History of Mankind, First Harper Perennial Edition, 2018 Autor Mikolaj Jan Piskorski, Social Strategy at Nike – reference 9-712-484 Harvard Business Publishing Hadiya Faheem, Digital Transformation at Startbucks – reference 922-0003-1, IBS

"The Program Contents, in particular points 2 to 7, may be changed to account for the evolution of the technological panorama.
CP1: Introduction to the technology panorama, with a focus on digitalization, automation and sustainability in the construction sector.
CP2: Artificial Intelligence (AI): principles and applications for process automation and optimization.
CP3: Internet of Things (IoT) and Digital Twins: monitoring, integration of sensors and intelligent management of infrastructures and buildings construction and operation.
CP4: Data capture with UAV.
CP5: Reality Capture: laser scanning, photogrammetry and creation of digital models.
CP6: Computer Vision applied to construction: image processing, pattern detection and task automation.
CP7: Robotics in construction: automation of manufacturing processes, 3D printing and robots for construction, maintenance and demolition.
CP8: Integration of disruptive technologies into real scenarios in the AECO sector."

"The assessment runs throughout the semester and combines theoretical and practical components, promoting an integrated approach that ensures the development of critical and practical skills, aligned with the distance learning model.
1.Theoretical Component (40%, minimum grade of 9.5)
_Essay with up to 3000 words in Portuguese or English, where students analyze a disruptive technology and its application in a sector other than construction (e.g. health, transport or agriculture).
_The essay must address the principles and history of the technology, its maturity level (using, for example, the TRL - Technology Readiness Level model), its impact on the sector, the adoption phase (using a model such as the Gartner Hype Cycle), the barriers to its adoption and the strategies for its widespread integration.
2. Practical Component (60%, minimum grade of 9.5)
_Individual or Group Project: Practical application of one of the disruptive technologies studied in CP2 to CP8 in a practical case in the AECO sector, addressing objectives OA2 and OA3.
_The project requires:
- Development of a practical solution that integrates technologies such as AI, IoT, Digital Twins, Drones/UAV, Reality Capture, Computer Vision or Robotics.
- Development of prototypes and carrying out tests in a real environment.
- Production of a technical report and a presentation, documenting the complete process and a reflection on the results.
The use of AI tools is permitted and must be identified and justified. There is no final exam. "

Mandatory

"NASA. (2021). Technology Readiness Levels (TRL). https://www.nasa.gov/pdf/458490main_TRL_Definitions.pdf Gartner. (2023). Hype Cycle for Emerging Technologies. https://www.gartner.com/en/research/methodologies/gartner-hype-cycle McKinsey & Co. (2023). From start-up to scale-up: Accelerating growth in construction technology. Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/private-capital/our-insights/from-start-up-to-scale-up-accelerating-growth-in-construction-technology Bricks & Bytes. (n.d.). https://bricks-bytes.com/ Shane, J. S., Madson, K. M., Mo, Y., Poleacovschi, C., & Sturgill, R. E., Jr. (Eds.). (2024). Construction Research Congress 2024: Advanced Technologies, Automation, and Computer Applications in Construction. American Society of Civil Engineers. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784485262"

Optional

"""McKinsey & Co. (2024). Technology trends outlook 2024. Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/mckinsey-digital/our-insights/the-top-trends-in-tech Christensen, C. M. (2016). The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail (Harper Business Essentials ed.). New York: Harper Business. Anderson, C. (2012). Makers: The New Industrial Revolution. New York: Crown Business. Deloitte. (2024). 2025 Engineering and Construction Industry Outlook. Retrieved from https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/industry/engineering-and-construction/engineering-and-construction-industry-outlook.html"" "